I proved this for $O(3)$. To do that, I defined $O(3)$ implicitly by $f(A) = AA^t - I = 0$. Identifying $\mathbb R^{3\times 3}$ with $\mathbb R^9$, I got $$f (a_{11}, ..., a_{33}) = \cases { a_{11}^2 + a_{12}^2 + a_{12}^2 - 1\\\\ a_{21}^2 + a_{22}^2 + a_{23}^2 - 1\\\\ a_{31}^2 + a_{32}^2 + a_{33}^2 - 1\\\\ a_{11}a_{21} + a_{12}a_{22} + a_{13}a_{23}\\\\ a_{11}a_{31} + a_{12}a_{32} + a_{13}a_{33}\\\\ a_{21}a_{31} + a_{22}a_{32} + a_{23}a_{33},}$$ and then showed that rank of $(\partial{f_i}/\partial{x^j})$ is maximal on $O(3)$. I tried to do it similarly for $SO(3)$. In this case $f(A) = \det A(AA^t) - I= 0$ should work, but then $(\partial{f_i}/\partial{x^j})$ seems to look like $$\small\begin{pmatrix} d_{11} + 2a_{11} & -d_{12} + 2a_{12} & d_{13} + 2a_{13} & -d_{21} & d_{22} & -d_{23} & d_{31} & -d_{32} & d_{33}\\ d_{11} & -d_{12} & d_{13} & -d_{21} + 2a_{21} & d_{22} + 2a_{22} & -d_{23} + 2a_{23} & d_{31} & -d_{32} & d_{33}\\ d_{11} & -d_{12} & d_{13} & -d_{21} & d_{22} & -d_{23} & d_{31} + 2a_{31} & -d_{32} + 2a_{32} & d_{33} + 2a_{33}\\ a_{21} & a_{22} & a_{23} & a_{11} & a_{12} & a_{13} & 0 & 0 & 0\\ a_{31} & a_{32} & a_{33} & 0 & 0 & 0 & a_{11} & a_{12} & a_{13}\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & a_{31} & a_{32} & a_{33} & a_{21} & a_{22} & a_{23}\\ \end{pmatrix},$$ where $d_{ij}$ are corresponding minors of $A$. I'm not sure how to show its rank is maximal. Can someone help with this, or should I use some other approach?
2026-04-04 17:11:25.1775322685
Prove $SO(3)$ is a smooth regular surface in $\mathbb R^{3\times 3}$
128 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in MATRIX-RANK
- Bases for column spaces
- relation between rank of power of a singular matrix with the algebraic multiplicity of zero
- How to determine the rank of the following general $\mathbb{R}$-linear transformation.
- How to prove the dimension identity of subspace? i.e. $\dim(V_1) + \dim(V_2) = \dim(V_1 + V_2) + \dim(V_1 \cap V_2)$
- How can I prove that $[T]_B$ is a reversible matrix?
- can I have $\det(A+B)=0$ if $\det(A)=0$ and $\det(B) \neq 0$?
- Let $A$ be a diagonalizable real matrix such as $A^3=A$. Prove that $\mbox{rank}(A) = \mbox{tr}(A^2)$
- Row permuation of a matrix for a non-zero diagonal
- Tensor rank as a first order formula
- Rank of Matrix , Intersection of 3 planes
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I would recommend that you not work in coordinates like this. Think of the space of $3\times 3$ matrices as a vector space $V$ and compute derivatives from the definition. In particular, since $f(A) = AA^\top$ is smooth, we know that for any $B\in V$, we have \begin{align*} df_A(B) &= \lim_{t\to 0}\frac{f(A+tB)-f(A)}t = \lim_{t\to 0}\frac{t(AB^\top + BA^\top +tBB^\top)}t \\ &= AB^\top + BA^\top. \end{align*} Now, you already noticed that $f$ maps $V$ to the vector space $W$ of symmetric $3\times 3$ matrices. We want to show that $df_A\colon V\to W$ is surjective for any $A\in O(n)$. So, for an arbitrary $C\in W$, your charge is to figure out $B\in V$ so that $df_A(B)=C$.