I don't want the proof for this question since I have already done one. But what I want is the explanation for the counterintuitive proof that the book provided me with.Here is it:
Let me give the details about 36(a) and 36(c).
36(a) Every subsequence of null sequence is null.
36(c) For some fixed positive integer k, The sequence $a_{n+k}$ is null if $a_{n}$ is null.
Explain me the proof in photo not the definition 36 (a and c).
Thanks for entertainment!
