prove that any Jordan measurable set in $\mathbb{R}^n$ under Diffeomorphism stays Jordan measurable set So what I thought is to split the set to bounded sets and show that for each the boundary is negligible. and we know that countable union of negligible sets is negligible. What I can't understand, is why can't a non boundary point in the Jordan set be mapped to a boundary in the output set. There might be a connection to this: Show continuously differentiable image of Jordan measurable set is Jordan measurable but Diffeomorphismness doesn't imply injectiveness.
2026-03-25 17:20:50.1774459250
prove that any Jordan measurable set in $\mathbb{R}^n$ under Diffeomorphism stays Jordan measurable set
325 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in DIFFEOMORPHISM
- Showing that a diffeomorphism preserves the boundary
- A diffeomorphism between a cylinder and a one-sheeted hyperboloid
- Moser invariant curves in discrete dynamical systems and how they give stability
- Proving that the Gauss map of a compact surface is a diffeo local
- Question about a specific equivalence relation induced by a diffeomorphism
- Basic question regarding diffeomorphism and path connectedness
- The weak limit of a sequence of diffeomorphisms is either a diffeomorphism or a constant?
- Is the closed hemisphere diffeomorphic to the closed disk?
- Some problems on surfaces
- Can a sequence of conformal diffeomorphisms converge to something which is neither a diffeomorphism nor a point?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The key facts are that (i) $A$ is Jordan measurable iff $\partial A$ is a null set, (ii) if $f$ is a homeomorphism then $f(\partial A) = \partial f(A)$ (show that $\overline{f(A)} = f(\overline{A})$), and (iii) a Lipschitz homeomorphism maps null sets to null sets.
First suppose $A$ is bounded & Jordan measurable, then since $f$ is a diffeomorphism it is Lipschitz on a compact rectangle containing $A$. Since $A$ is Jordan measurable we see that $\partial A $ is a null set. Then $f(\partial A) = \partial f(A)$ is a null set and hence $f(A)$ is Jordan measurable.
Now let $A_m = A \cap [m_1,m_1+1) \times \cdots \times [m_n,m_n+1)$ for $m \in \mathbb{Z}^n$. It is straightforward to show that $\partial (B \cap C) \subset \partial B \cup \partial C$, hence we see that the $A_m$ are Jordan measurable and so $\partial A_m$ is null.
I claim that $\partial A \subset \cup_m \partial A_m$. If this is true, then $\partial f(A) \subset \cup_m \partial f(A_m)$ and so $f(A)$ is Jordan measurable.
To demonstrate the claim, first suppose $x \in \partial A$, then I claim that $x \in \partial (A \cap B(x,1))$. To see this, suppose $a_n \in A, b_n \in A^c$ and $a_n \to x, b_n \to x$. Then for sufficiently large $n$ we have $a_n \in A \cap B(x,1)$ and $b_n \in A^c \subset (A \cap B(x,1))^c =A^c \cup B(x,1)^c $ and so $x \in \partial (A \cap B(x,1))$. Now let $I= \{ m | B(x,1) \cap A_m \ne \emptyset \}$ and hence $A \cap B(x,1) \subset \cup_{m \in I} A_m$ and so $\partial (A \cap B(x,1)) \subset \cup_{m \in I} \partial A_m \subset \cup_m \partial A_m$. Hence $\partial A \subset \cup_m \partial A_m$.