I saw a similar questuion here Show triangulations can be transformed into each other by edge flip. asked 8 years ago. It claimed that it is easy to show there exists a sequence of edge flip that will increase the number of common edges of two different triangulations of a convex polygon, but I still cannot figure out how. Any hint? Thank you in advance.
2026-03-25 19:06:17.1774465577
Prove that any two triangulations of a convex polygon can be transformed into each other by a sequence of edge flips.
592 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GRAPH-THEORY
- characterisation of $2$-connected graphs with no even cycles
- Explanation for the static degree sort algorithm of Deo et al.
- A certain partition of 28
- decomposing a graph in connected components
- Is it true that if a graph is bipartite iff it is class 1 (edge-coloring)?
- Fake induction, can't find flaw, every graph with zero edges is connected
- Triangle-free graph where every pair of nonadjacent vertices has exactly two common neighbors
- Inequality on degrees implies perfect matching
- Proving that no two teams in a tournament win same number of games
- Proving that we can divide a graph to two graphs which induced subgraph is connected on vertices of each one
Related Questions in CONVEX-ANALYSIS
- Proving that: $||x|^{s/2}-|y|^{s/2}|\le 2|x-y|^{s/2}$
- Convex open sets of $\Bbb R^m$: are they MORE than connected by polygonal paths parallel to the axis?
- Show that this function is concave?
- In resticted domain , Applying the Cauchy-Schwarz's inequality
- Area covered by convex polygon centered at vertices of the unit square
- How does positive (semi)definiteness help with showing convexity of quadratic forms?
- Why does one of the following constraints define a convex set while another defines a non-convex set?
- Concave function - proof
- Sufficient condition for strict minimality in infinite-dimensional spaces
- compact convex sets
Related Questions in POLYGONS
- Can the relocation of one control point of a NURBS curve be compensated by an adjustment of some weights?
- Need a hint regarding this question...
- How do I detect if a circle overlaps with a polygon or not?
- A peculiar Diophantine equation
- Looking for Regular Polygons with a Side to Diagonal ratio Equaling a Metallic Mean
- Calculating the value of $\pi$
- Bounding Numbers for $N>2$
- Generalizing Odom's construction of the golden ratio
- Integrating difficult function over a polygon
- Existence and uniqueness of a Riemann-Hilbert problem involving a polygon
Related Questions in TRIANGULATION
- Simplicial complex underlying space homeomorphic to torus/klein bottle
- Is the following triangulation valid?
- Need help in understanding the argument in a proof of polygon triangulation
- Triangulation of the projective plane (number of points required)
- Fake torus triangulation in Munkres
- Is this a valid triangulation of Moebius strip?
- Prove that no set of $n$ points can be triangulated in more than $2^{n \choose 2}$ ways.
- Finding the location of point P
- Cutting a square into non-similar triangles
- Delaunay Triangulation in 3D
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Flipping an edge is a reversible process, so if we show that any triangulation $T$ can reach a specific fixed $T_0$ by flipping, then to reach $T'$ from $T$, go from $T$ to $T_0$, then back in reverse from $T_0$ to $T'$.
As a choice for $T_0$, we could take the "scallop" triangulation, where all edges connect to a single vertex. To reach this from any $T$, we can do the following: if less than $n-3$ edges connect to our vertex $v_0$, we may find an edge that is internal, and flip it to increase the number of edges connected to $v_0$.
To justify why we can always find such an edge to flip that increases this is an obvious fact geometrically, and to justify this rigorously we could use that the number of triangles in the triangulation is independent of the triangulation, so less than $n-3$ edges connecting to $v_0$ yields a proper subset of the triangles. If this last bit is unclear, you should draw the pictures to convince yourself that this geometric fact is obvious.