I have come across a problem in a compact metric space chapter of a Real Analysis text:
It states that $P_i$ is a family of closed, nonempty subsets of X with an empty intersection. Where X is a compact metric space.
It asks for proof that $\forall x\in X$, there is a positive distance between $x$ and $P_i$ for some $i\in I$.
I understand the suggested proof, which uses the fact that convergent sequences in a compact metric space have convergent sub-sequences, to show that $x\in P_i\ \forall i$, if $d(x,P_i)=0$ (which is a contradiction).
However, I fail to see why we need to require X to be compact.
It seems to me, that we could simply state if $d(x,P_i)=0\ \forall i$, Then there is an x in one of the members of $P_i$ and a y in a different member of $P_i$ such that $d(x,y)=0$ but because these sets have an empty intersection, $x\neq y$ contradicting the distance axiom of ANY metric space, not just a compact metric space.
Any suggestions?
You are right, you don't need $X$ to be compact. But I don't understand your proof. Instead, I provide a proof for the statement.
Suppose that there is a point $x\in X$ such that $d(x,P_i)=0$ for all $i.$ This means that, for each $j,$ either $x$ is a point of $P_j$ or $x$ is a limit point of $P_j$ and since $P_j$ is a closed set, then necessarily $x\in P_j,$ which implies that $x\in\bigcap\limits_iP_i$ and hence $\bigcap\limits_iP_i\neq\varnothing.$ The result follows taking the contrapositive.