Prove that: {$f_n$} converges unifromly to $f$ on $E$ as $n \rightarrow \infty$ if and only if $\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} ||f_n-f||_u = 0$
I don't understand the approach for the Forward proof.
My approach is:
By definition, for $\epsilon > 0$, there exist $N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $|f_n(x) - f(x)| < \epsilon$; hence, the smallest upper bound should also be less than the $\epsilon$ (i.e., ${sup}_{x \in E}|f_n(x)-f(x)| < \epsilon$). Thus, $\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} ||f_n-f||_u = 0$.
However, the solution uses $\frac{\epsilon}{2}$ as the following:
$|f_n(x)-f| \leq {sup}_{x \in E}|f_n(x)-f(x)| < \epsilon $
${sup}_{x \in E}|f_n(x)-f(x)| \leq \frac{\epsilon}{2}$
${sup}_{x \in E}|f_n(x)-f(x)| \leq \frac{\epsilon}{2} < \epsilon$
Hence, $\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} ||f_n-f||_u = 0$.
Why?
Supremum preserves only weak inequalities, not strict inequalities. If all elements of a set $A$ are smaller than $\epsilon$ it only implies that $\sup (A)\leq\epsilon$, and not necessary $\sup (A)<\epsilon$. That's why they use $\frac{\epsilon}{2}$. If all the elements of $A$ are less than $\frac{\epsilon}{2}$ then $\sup(A)\leq\frac{\epsilon}{2}<\epsilon$. This way we indeed get the strict inequality $\sup(A)<\epsilon$.
Not that it really matters. If you prove that for each $\epsilon>0$ we eventually have $||f_n-f||\leq\epsilon$ then it proves that $||f_n-f||\to 0$. But I guess they wanted to prove it with strict inequality.