Let $f(n)$ denote the largest number of edges on $n$ vertices among triangle-free graphs that are non-bipartite . For all $n \geq 5 $ prove that:
- $f(n) \le \frac{1}{4} (n-1)^2+1$
- Let's construct a graph where $" = "$ occurs.
It's easy to see that $Mantel's $problem gives us a structured result similar to mine (though I don't know if it helps)
$Mantel$ Problem : Deduce from the proof of Mantel theorem the following strengthening of the assertion. Let G be a triangle-free graph of order n. Then $ e(G)≤n^2/4$
According to the problem , the given graph cannot be divided into non - bipartite graph , so it will have an odd degree cycle .
I am thinking of dividing the vertices of the graph into 2 parts, one part contains the vertices in that cycle, the other part contains the remaining vertices. But my work has not progressed at all.
Proof. Since the graph does not contain triangles, for any edge $uv$ we have $\deg(u)+\deg(v)\leq n$. The following three cases are possible.
(1) There is a pair of adjacent vertices $u,v$ for which $\operatorname{deg}u+\operatorname{deg}v=n$.
(2) There is a pair of adjacent vertices $u,v$ for which $\operatorname{deg}u+\operatorname{deg}v=n-1$.
(3) For any adjacent vertices $u$ and $v$ the inequality $\operatorname{deg}u+\operatorname{deg}v\leq n-2$ holds.
Consider each case.
(1) If $\operatorname{deg}u+\operatorname{deg}v=n$, then our graph is bipartite with parts $N(u)$ and $N(v)$, where $N(x)$ are all neighbors of $x$.
(2) Let $\operatorname{deg}u+\operatorname{deg}v=n-1$ and $w\notin N(u)\cup N(v)$. If $N(w)\cap N(u)=\varnothing$ or $N(w)\cap N(v)=\varnothing$, then the graph is bipartite. If $k=|N(w)\cap N(u)|>0$ and $l=|N(w)\cap N(v)|>0$ and $d=\operatorname{deg}u$, then since the graph without triangles $$ |E(G)|\leq \operatorname{deg}u\cdot \operatorname{deg}v+k+l-kl\leq \operatorname{deg}u\cdot \operatorname{deg}v+1=(n-1)d-d^2+1= $$ $$ -\left(d-\frac{n-1}{2}\right)^2+\frac{(n-1)^2}{4}+1\leq\frac{(n-1)^2}{4}+1. $$
(3) If $\operatorname{deg}u+\operatorname{deg}v\leq n-2$ for any adjacent vertices $u$ and $v$, then $$ (n-2)|E(G)|\geq\sum_{uv\in E(G)}(\operatorname{deg}u+\operatorname{deg}v)= \sum_{u\in V(G)}(\operatorname{deg}u)^2\geq $$ $$ \frac{1}{n}\left(\sum_{u\in V(G)}\operatorname{deg}u\right)^2=\frac{4|E(G)|^2}{n}. $$ So $$ |E(G)|\leq\frac{n(n-2)}{4}<\frac{(n-1)^2}{4}. $$
Addendum (in response to @ZFR's 20.07.2022 questions).
If $uv$ is an edge, $\deg(u)+deg(v)=n-1$, $N(u)\cap N(v)=\varnothing$, $w\notin N(u)\cup N(v)$, and for example $N(w)\cap N(u)=\varnothing$, then the graph is bipartite and its parts are $N(v)$ and $N(u)\cup\{w\}$.
Why does the inequality $$ |E(G)|\leq\deg(u)\cdot\deg(v)+k+l-kl $$ hold?
In a graph $G$ there can be only edges connecting vertices of sets $N(u)$ and $N(v)$ except for edges connecting vertices $N(w)\cap N(u)$ and $N(w)\cap N(v)$ (such edges cannot exceed $\deg(u)\cdot\deg(v)-kl$), edges connecting the vertex $w$ with some vertices of $N(u)$ and $N(v)$ (there are exactly $k+l$).
The inequality $k+l-kl\leq1$ follows from the fact that $(k-1)(l-1)\geq0$.