Suppose $A \setminus B ⊆ C ∩ D$ and $x \in A$. Prove that if $x \not \in D$ then $x \in B$.
We can rewrite $A \setminus B ⊆ C ∩ D$ using logical connectives as follows: $(x \in A \land x \not \in B) \implies (x \in C \land x \in D)$
It can be seen that if $x \in A$ and $x \not \in B$ then x must be in $D$.
Given that $x \not \in D$. In this case, either $x \not \in A$ or $x \in B$.
Given that $x \in A$. Therefore, $x \in B$.
Apparently, more complete way to describe statement $A \setminus B ⊆ C ∩ D$ would be $\forall x \big((x \in A \land x \not \in B) \implies (x \in C \land x \in D)\big)$
Is it OK to omit quantifier ($\forall$) like I did? And in general, is the proof above correct? Any suggestions for improvement will be welcome!
The proof is correct, there's no need to improve anything unless you want to be very formal. You can omit the quantifier $\forall$, because if something is true for all $x$, then it's particularily true for the one $x$ that you're given.