Suppose A, B, and C are sets, $A \setminus B \subseteq C$, and $x$ is anything at all. Prove that if $x \in A \setminus C$ then $x \in B$.
Suppose $x \in A \setminus C$.
Suppose $x \notin B$. It follows that $ x \in A\setminus C\setminus B$, which means $x \in A \setminus B$. Since $\setminus ⊆$ it implies that $ x \in C$, which contradicts our assumption that $x \in A\setminus C $. Hence if $x \in A \setminus C $ then $x \in B$.
Is it accurate?
One more question is, wouldn't it be better if we rephrased initial statement as:
Suppose $A \setminus B \subseteq C$. Prove that if $x \in A \setminus C$ then $x \in B$.
It feels that "A,B,C are sets" and "x is anything at all" are redundant here.
"x is anything at all" can be rephrased as $x$ is arbitrary". Still, it is important to introduce the variables you use. One way would be to make the sets subsets of an universal set $\Omega$. The you could reword: Let $A,B,C \subset \Omega$ be sets and $x \in \Omega$ arbitrary. Prove that ...
I don't quite know what you mean by this.
Since you added the tag
proof writingone suggestion would be to write $$ \color{red}{(}A \setminus C\color{red}{)} \setminus B = A \cap C^{\complement} \cap B^{\complement} = A \cap B^{\complement} \cap C^{\complement} = (A \setminus B) \setminus C $$ This makes it clear to see that $$ [(A \setminus C) \setminus B] \subset [A \setminus B] $$Otherwise your proof is perfectly fine, though I don't think you need the last sentence as it just repeats the task. An alternative would be something like "and this concludes the proof".