So I write 3 Bézout's identities :
$au+bv=1$
$bv+cw=1$
$au+cw=1$
We could have taken different $u,v,w$...
By multiplying I obtain :
$1=ab(v^2ub+u^2va+uvwc)+ac(w^2uc+u^2wa+uvwb)+bc(v^2wb+w^2vc)$
By taking : $v^2ub+u^2va+uvwc=x \in \mathbb{Z}, \ w^2uc+u^2wa+uvwb=y\in\mathbb{Z}, \ v^2wb+w^2vc=z\in\mathbb{Z}$ then $\gcd(bc,ac,ab)=1$.
Now I want to generalize it to a product of $n$ terms without the $i^{th}$ term. Are there any faster methods than developing ?
PS : This statement is a key to start the proof of the CRT !
Thanks in advance !
Suppose a prime $p$ divides $\gcd(bc,ac,ab)$; then $p\mid (bc)$, so it either divides $b$ or it divides $c$, but not both because $\gcd(b,c)=1$.
Suppose $p\mid b$ and $p\nmid c$. Since $p\mid ac$, we conclude $p\mid a$, contradicting $\gcd(a,b)=1$.
Similarly, assuming $p\nmid b$ and $p\mid c$ leads to a contradiction, by considering that $p\mid ab$.
Can we generalize it to more than three numbers? Suppose $a_1,a_2,\dots,a_n$ are pairwise coprime. Set $$ c_i=\frac{a_1a_2\dots a_n}{a_i} $$ Then $\gcd(c_1,c_2,\dots,c_n)=1$.
Indeed, if $p$ is a prime divisor of $\gcd(c_1,c_2,\dots,c_n)=1$. Then $p\mid c_n$, so $p$ divides exactly one of $a_1,\dots,a_{n-1}$. Without loss of generality we can say that $p\mid a_1$; since also $p\mid c_1$, we get a contradiction, because by assumption $\gcd(a_1,a_j)$ for $j>1$.
Actually, this is a distributive lattice property. Let's consider \begin{align} (b\lor c)\land (a\lor c)\land(a\lor b) &=(b\lor c)\land\bigl(a\lor(b\land c)\bigr)\\ &=\bigl((b\lor c)\land a)\lor(b\land c)\\ &=(a\land b)\lor(a\land c)\lor(b\land c) \end{align} and, if $a\land b=a\land c=b\land c=\mathbf{0}$, then also $$ (b\lor c)\land (a\lor c)\land(a\lor b)=\mathbf{0} $$ (where $\mathbf{0}$ denotes the minimum element of the lattice). Here the distributive lattice is the natural numbers under divisibility, where the minimum is $1$, $\land$ is the gcd and $\lor$ is the lcm.