Question: Suppose for each $j\in\mathbb{N}, f_j:[0,1]\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ is Lebesgue measurable such that $0\leq f_j\leq\frac{3}{2}$ and $\int_0^1 f_j dm=1$. Prove that $m(\{x\in[0,1]:\lim \sup_{j\rightarrow\infty}f_j(x)\geq\frac{1}{2}\})\geq\frac{1}{2}$.
Thoughts/Attempt: Let $A=\{x\in[0,1]:\lim \sup_{j\rightarrow\infty}f_j(x)\geq\frac{1}{2}\}$, and $B=\{x\in[0,1]:\lim \sup_{j\rightarrow\infty}f_j(x)<\frac{1}{2}\}$. Suppose, by contradiction, that $m(A)<\frac{1}{2}$. So, we can split up the integral as $$\int_0^1f_jdm=\int_Af_jdm+\int_Bf_jdm$$ where we get equality by the integral in the assumption. Now, $\int_Af_jdm<\frac{1}{2}$, by our (contradiction) assumption. And, $\int_Bf_jdm<\frac{1}{2}$, using our set $B$. Therefore, $$\int_0^1f_jdm<\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}=1$$ a contradiction, since this integral must equal $1$ from our assumption. Hence, we contradict that $m(A)<\frac{1}{2}$.
However, I am not quite sure if this works, because our sets are dealing with the $\lim\sup f_j(x)$ as $x\in[0,1]$, but wouldn't I have to compensate in the integral since the image of $f_j$ is all of $\mathbb{R}$?
To handle the $\limsup$ for your integrals over $B$, I suggest using Fatou's lemma.
Fatou's lemma only applies to non-negative functions, and $\tfrac 3 2 - f_n(x)$ is a non-negative function. Applying Fatou to $\tfrac 3 2 - f_n(x)$ on $B$, we have $$ \int_B \liminf_{n \to \infty}\left(\tfrac 3 2 - f_n (x)\right) dm \leq \liminf_{n \to \infty} \int_B \left(\tfrac 3 2 - f_n (x)\right) dm,$$ or equivalently, $$ \limsup_{n \to \infty} \int_B f_n(x) dm \leq \int_B \limsup_{n \to \infty} f_n(x) \leq \tfrac 1 2 m(B).$$
Meanwhile, the correct inequality for the integrals over $A$ is $$ \int_A f_n(x) dm \leq \tfrac 3 2 m(A)$$ for each $n \in \mathbb N$. (It seems like you've missed the factor of $\tfrac 3 2$, coming from the upper bound on $f_n$.)
Thus $$ 1 = \limsup_{n \to \infty}\int_0^1 f_n(x) dx \leq \tfrac 3 2 m(A) + \tfrac 1 2 m(B) = m(A) + \tfrac 1 2,$$ which clearly implies that $m(A) \geq \tfrac 1 2$.