My question: Prove that $\Sigma \mathbb CP^2\cong S^3\vee S^5.$ The following is a proof of this result.
As well known, the complex projective plane $\mathbb{C}P^2$ can be obtained from the sphere $\mathbb S^2$ by attaching a 4-dimensional cell along the Hopf map $\rho: \mathbb S^3\to \mathbb S^2.$ In other words, we have the following CW complex structure for $\mathbb{C}P^2$: $$ \mathbb{C}P^2 = (\mathbb S^2\sqcup \mathbb D^4)/\sim\ = \mathbb S^2\cup_{\rho} \mathbb D^4$$ where the identification is given by $x\sim \rho (x)$ for $x\in \mathbb S^3$. Taking the suspension of $\mathbb{C}P^2$, we have $$\Sigma\mathbb{C}P^2 = (\mathbb S^3\sqcup S^1\sqcup \mathbb D^5)/\sim\ = \mathbb S^3\cup_{\rho} (\mathbb S^1\sqcup \mathbb D^5)$$ where the identification is given by identifying the basepoints of $\mathbb S^3$ and $\mathbb S^1$ and collapsing the $\mathbb S^1$ factor to a point. We can further simplify this space by noting that $\mathbb S^1\sqcup \mathbb D^5$ is homeomorphic to $\mathbb S^5$ via the map $(\theta,x)\mapsto(\cos\theta x,\sin\theta x)$ for $\theta\in[0,\pi]$ and $x\in \mathbb D^5$, which identifies the equator of $\mathbb S^5$ with $\mathbb S^1\subseteq \mathbb S^5$. Under this homeomorphism, the Hopf map $\rho$ becomes a map $g: \mathbb S^3\to \mathbb S^5$ that sends the equator of $\mathbb S^3$ to the equator of $\mathbb S^5$ and the north and south poles of $\mathbb S^3$ to the two points where the equator of $\mathbb S^5$ intersects the $\mathbb S^3$ factor of $\Sigma\mathbb{C}P^2$. Thus, we must have $\Sigma\mathbb{C}P^2\cong \mathbb S^3\cup_g \mathbb S^5\cong \mathbb S^3\vee \mathbb S^5.$
Give me your comments on this proof. Does it have any errors? I appreciate someone has another idea that allows proof.
Unfortunately, your proof can't be right since $\Sigma \mathbb{C}P^2$ is not homotopy equivalent to $S^3 \vee S^5$. This can be seen since the Steenrod square $\mathrm{Sq}^2$ is nontrivial on $H^3(\Sigma \mathbb{C}P^2; \mathbb{Z}/2)$. This is because there are in $H^2(\mathbb{C}P^2; \mathbb{Z}/2)$ with nontrivial squares.
The error in your proof is that you don't understand what attaching maps or CW structures on suspensions are. Particularly,
does not make sense since (a suspension of) the Hopf map should decrease degree by 1. As well,
is not a correct CW decomposition. If one is taking an unreduced suspension, the $S^1$ should be an interval. If one is taking a reduced suspension, it should just not appear.