I am trying to prove that the category of Rings is cocomplete. Of course, it suffices to show that it has coproducts and coequalizers. I looked at this page and I think I get the coequalizer, but I am still unsure of how to take the quotients out of the free ring. I would be grateful for your explanation.
2026-02-23 13:36:53.1771853813
Prove that the category of Rings is cocomplete
69 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ABSTRACT-ALGEBRA
- Feel lost in the scheme of the reducibility of polynomials over $\Bbb Z$ or $\Bbb Q$
- Integral Domain and Degree of Polynomials in $R[X]$
- Fixed points of automorphisms of $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta)$
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- A commutative ring is prime if and only if it is a domain.
- Conjugacy class formula
- Find gcd and invertible elements of a ring.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- polynomial remainder theorem proof, is it legit?
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
Related Questions in RING-THEORY
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- A commutative ring is prime if and only if it is a domain.
- Find gcd and invertible elements of a ring.
- Prove that $R[x]$ is an integral domain if and only if $R$ is an integral domain.
- Prove that $Z[i]/(5)$ is not a field. Check proof?
- If $P$ is a prime ideal of $R[x;\delta]$ such as $P\cap R=\{0\}$, is $P(Q[x;\delta])$ also prime?
- Let $R$ be a simple ring having a minimal left ideal $L$. Then every simple $R$-module is isomorphic to $L$.
- A quotient of a polynomial ring
- Does a ring isomorphism between two $F$-algebras must be a $F$-linear transformation
- Prove that a ring of fractions is a local ring
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Related Questions in COPRODUCT
- Correct commutative diagrams and other needed clarifications for an exercises on coequalizer and coproduct from Arbib and Manes' text
- Is the "dual associate" of a categorical coproduct characterized by some universal property?
- Regarding a morphism going to a coproduct in a category
- Getting a coproduct from a product
- How to do the following exercise about showing the sum of two identical two elements group is infinite.
- When is coproduct called disjoint union?
- Two definitions of Direct sum
- does anyone know of a book where it shows a sketch of the proof of the statement?
- Correct definition of projection and injection maps for product and coproduct for the following category?
- Is this the the correct way for constructing Coproduct in $\textbf{Vect}$?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Here's a perspective that may be considered. The category $\mathsf{Ring}$ is the category of algebras of a (finitary) algebraic theory. In classical universal algebraic terms this means that a ring $R$ is a set endowed with two binary operations $+, \cdot$, a unary operation $-$, and two $0$-ary operations $0$ and $1$ satisfying a set of equations (e.g. left distributivity: $$ x \cdot (y+z) \equiv x \cdot y + x \cdot z \text{).}$$ Every category of algebras $\mathsf{Alg_\mathsf{T}}$ of an algebraic theory $\mathsf{T}$ is both complete and cocomplete.
To see that $\mathsf{Alg_\mathsf{T}}$ is complete it is not difficult: the forgetful functor $U: \mathsf{Alg_\mathsf{T}} \to \mathsf{Set}$ preserves and reflects limits and $\mathsf{Set}$ is complete (it has products and equalizers).
To see that $\mathsf{Alg_\mathsf{T}}$ is cocomplete is a bit more laborious. The essential ingredients are:
$\mathsf{Alg_\mathsf{T}}$ is a full subcategory of $[\mathsf{T}, \mathsf{Set}]$, the category of functors from $\mathsf{T}$ to $\mathsf{Set}$. Indeed, $\mathsf{Alg_\mathsf{T}}$ is the category of finite-products-preserving functors from $\mathsf{T}$ to $\mathsf{Set}$.
$\mathsf{Alg_\mathsf{T}}$ is reflectieve in $[\mathsf{T}, \mathsf{Set}]$, that is the inclusion has a left adjoint. To prove this one relies on the General Adjoint Functor Theorem.
If $\mathsf{D}$ is a reflective subcategory of $\mathsf{C}$, $\mathsf{D}$ has all colimits that $\mathsf{C}$ has.
$[\mathsf{T}, \mathsf{Set}]$ is cocomplete since $\mathsf{Set}$ is cocomplete and a functor category has all colimits that the codomain has, constructed componentwise.