I have this function and I want to prove it is Borel measurable. $$\begin{equation} f:\mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow\mathbb{R}:f(x,y)=\begin{cases} \sin(\frac{1}{x-y}) &\text{ for } x>y \\\ x^2+y^2 &\text{ for } x\leq y \end{cases}\end{equation}$$ I thought you could start with only looking at the first part (so for $x>y$) and then the other part. Because if they were both Borel measurable then the function is too. But now I don't know how to do them apart.
2026-03-25 10:51:31.1774435891
Prove that this function is Borel Measurable.
458 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in BOREL-MEASURES
- Versions of Lusin theorem
- Measure Theory Uncountable example with real line in $\sigma$ algebra
- Function is almost everywhere 1 w.r.t. sequence of Borel probability measures
- Is the Space of Borel Probability Measures over R connected?
- Permutation of binary expansion on (0,1)
- Measure theory sequence limsup
- $f^{-1}([-\infty,r))$ measurable for all rational numbers $r$
- A problem of measurable function in Cohn’s book.
- Uniqueness of measure by Laplace transformation
- Why is $\emptyset$ the only open null set?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let $h(x,y)=\frac 1 {x-y}$ if $x >y$ and $0$ otherwise. Then $f(x,y)=\sin (h(x,y))I_A(x,y)+(x^{2}+y^{2})I_B$ where $A=\{(x,y): x>y\}$ and $B=\{(x,y): x\leq y\}$. Since products of Borel measurable functions, compositions of Borel measurable functions and sums of Borel measurable are Borel measurable it is enough it is enough to check that $h$ is Borel measurable. For this it is enough to check that $\{(x,y): h(x,y) <a\}$ is measurable for any $a \geq 0$ I will leave this last part to you.