Problem $2.23$: Suppose $V$ is open in $\mathbb R^k$ and $\mu$ is a finite positive Borel measure on $\mathbb R^k$. Is the function $f(x)=\mu(V+x)$ continuous? lower semicontinuous? upper semicontinuous?
The problem above already has an answer here, which I do not understand quite well. Moreover, I'm primarily looking for help to complete my work on the above problem, or get solutions along the lines of what I have thought.
My work: I have already guessed that $f$ is lower semicontinuous. It is easy to see that $f$ need not be continuous or upper semicontinuous, by considering Dirac measures and appropriate open sets. Consider some $V$ and $\mu$ which satisfy the hypothesis. We want to show that $A = \{x: f(x) > \alpha\}$ is open for every real $\alpha$. Consider $x\in A$. It suffices to find $r_x > 0$ such that $B(x,r_x) \subset A$, where $B(x,r_x)$ denotes the open ball of radius $r_x$ centered at $x$. Since $x\in A$, $\mu(V+x) > \alpha$. Also, $V+x$ is open due to the openness of $V$. We can write $V$ as a disjoint, at most countable union, of open cubes $\{Q_j\}$ in $\mathbb R^k$, i.e. $$V + a = \bigcup_{j=1}^\infty Q_j$$ How do I find a required $r_x$?
Thank you!
Update: Thanks to the current answer, I have at least one solution that works - but I still need help in completing my attempt.
Let $g(t):=\mathbb{1}_V(t)$. If $V$ is open, then $\phi$ is lower semicontinuous and so, for any $x_n\rightarrow x$ $$g(t-x)=\mathbb{1}_{V+x}(t)\leq\liminf_n\mathbb{1}_{V+x_n}(t)=\liminf_ng(t-x_n)$$
An application of Fatou's lemma gives $$\phi(x):=\int\mathbb{1}_{V+x}\,d\mu\leq \int\liminf_n\mathbb{1}_{V+x_n}\leq\liminf_n\int\mathbb{1}_{V+x_n}\,d\mu=\liminf_n\phi(x_n)$$ This means that $\phi$ is lower semicontinuous.
Here we used the fact that a function $f:X\subset \mathbb{R}^d\rightarrow\overline{\mathbb{R}}$ is lower semicontinuous (l.s.c.) iff $f(x)\leq \liminf_n f(x_n)$ for all $x\in X$ and $(x_n:n\in\mathbb{N})\subset X$ with $x_n\xrightarrow{n\rightarrow\infty}x$.
Sketch of a Proof:
Suppose $f$ is l.s.c. on $X$. Fix $x\in X$, and let $x_n$ be a sequence in $X$ that converges to $x$. For any $a<f(x)$, $V_a:=\{f>a\}$ is an open set (in $X$) and so, there is $N\in\mathbb{N}$ such that $f(x_n)\in V_a$ for all $n\geq N$. This means that $a<f(x_n)$ for all $n\geq N$. Consequently, $a\leq\liminf_nf(x_n)$. Since this holds for any $a<f(x)$, we conclude that $f(x)\leq\liminf_nf(x_n)$.
Conversely, suppose $f$ satisfies the property $f(x)\leq\limsup_nf(x_n)$ for any $x\in X$ and sequence $x_n$ in $X$ such that $x_n\xrightarrow{n\rightarrow\infty}x$. Let $a\in\mathbb{R}$ and define $F_a:=\{f\leq a\}$. If we show that $F_a$ is closed (in $X$) then the desired conclusion will follow. Suppose $x_n$ is a sequence in $F_a$ that converges to some $x\in X$. Then $f(x_n)\leq a$ for all $n$ and so, $$f(x)\leq \liminf_nf(x_n)\leq a$$ Hence $x\in F_a$.
Comments: