Suppose we have a set of assumptions $\Delta$ and can show that $\Delta \vdash A$, and then $A \vdash B$.
Are we then able to say $\Delta \vdash B$? If so what lets us say this?
2026-03-31 15:45:48.1774971948
Proving a chain of well-formed formulas in metalogic
67 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LOGIC
- Theorems in MK would imply theorems in ZFC
- What is (mathematically) minimal computer architecture to run any software
- What formula proved in MK or Godel Incompleteness theorem
- Determine the truth value and validity of the propositions given
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- Help with Propositional Logic Proof
- Symbol for assignment of a truth-value?
- Find the truth value of... empty set?
- Do I need the axiom of choice to prove this statement?
- Prove that any truth function $f$ can be represented by a formula $φ$ in cnf by negating a formula in dnf
Related Questions in PROOF-EXPLANATION
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Help with Propositional Logic Proof
- Lemma 1.8.2 - Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski Theory
- Proof of Fourier transform of cos$2\pi ft$
- Total number of nodes in a full k-ary tree. Explanation
- Finding height of a $k$-ary tree
- How to get the missing brick of the proof $A \circ P_\sigma = P_\sigma \circ A$ using permutations?
- Inner Product Same for all Inputs
- Complex Derivatives in Polar Form
- Confused about how to prove a function is surjective/injective?
Related Questions in PROPOSITIONAL-CALCULUS
- Help with Propositional Logic Proof
- Can we use the principle of Explosion to justify the definition of implication being True when the antecedent is False?
- Simplify $(P \wedge Q \wedge R)\vee(\neg P\wedge Q\wedge\neg R)\vee(\neg P\wedge\neg Q\wedge R)\vee(\neg P \wedge\neg Q\wedge\neg R)$
- Alternative theories regarding the differences between the material conditional and the indicative conditionals used in natural language?
- Translations into logical notation
- Is the negation of $(a\wedge\neg b) \to c = a \wedge\neg b \wedge\neg c$?
- I am kind of lost in what do I do from here in Propositional Logic Identities. Please help
- Boolean Functional completeness of 5 operator set in propositional logic
- Variables, Quantifiers, and Logic
- Comparison Propositional Logic
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Generally speaking, yes. You can just concatenate the first proof and the second proof and it will yield the third proof.
Precise details of how you glue them together to get another well formed proof will depend on the deductive system. (But e.g. in a Hilbert-style system it is as simple as appending the lines of the second proof to the end of the first.)