So I am trying to show $\epsilon(S(a)) = \epsilon(a)$, where $\epsilon$ is the co-unit and $S$ is the antipode. \begin{align} \epsilon(S(a)) &= \epsilon( S( \sum_{(a)} a^{(1)} \epsilon(a^{(2)}) ) ) \\ &= \epsilon( S( \sum_{(a)} \epsilon(a^{(1)}) a^{(2)} ) ) \\ &= \epsilon( \sum_{(a)} \epsilon(a^{(1)}) S(a^{(2)}) ) \\ &= \epsilon( \epsilon(a) I ) \\ &= \epsilon(a) \end{align} However, I am unsure of the last 3 lines. Particularly the case $$ \sum_{(a)} \epsilon(a^{(1)}) S(a^{(2)}) = \epsilon(a)I $$ What is the identity that is used here?
2026-03-30 05:55:18.1774850118
Proving antipode of Hopf algebra property
114 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in HOPF-ALGEBRAS
- From a compact topological group to a commutative Hopf algebra
- Quasitriangular Sweedler bialgebra
- When do we have $C(G) \otimes C(G) =C(G\times G)?$
- $n$-fold product is a morphism of coalgebras
- Book recommendation for Hopf algebras
- What are $q$-deformations?
- Morphisms from Hopf algebra to commutative algebra form a group
- Example of $V^* \otimes V^*$ not isomorphic to $(V \otimes V)^*$
- How the coproduct defines an action on $X\otimes Y$
- Intuition behind the relation of commutative Hopf algebra and Groups
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The identity in question $$ \sum_{(a)} ε( a^{(1)} ) S( a^{(2)} ) = ε(a) 1_H \tag{$\ast$} $$ isn’t true. To see this, we consider for a non-trivial group $G$ and its group-algebra $[G]$. The comultiplication, counit and antipode of $[G]$ are given by $$ Δ(g) = g ⊗ g \,, \quad ε(g) = 1 \,, \quad S(g) = g^{-1} $$ for every element $g$ of $G$. It follows that for every non-trivial element $g$ of $G$, $$ \sum_{(g)} ε( g^{(1)} ) S( g^{(2)} ) = ε( g ) S( g ) = 1 ⋅ g^{-1} = g^{-1} ≠ 1 = ε(g) \,. $$
If we take a step back, then we see that the identity $(\ast)$ can’t make sense. We arived at the left-hand side of $(\ast)$ from the chain of (correct) equalities $$ S(a) = S\biggl( \sum_{(a)} ε( a^{(1)} ) a^{(2)} \biggr) = \sum_{(a)} ε( a^{(1)} ) S( a^{(2)} ) \,. $$ Therefore, the formula $(\ast)$ is just a complicated reformulation of the equivalent formula $$ S(a) = ε(a) 1_H \,. $$ And this is clearly nonsense.