The way I use to see that this is true is to take the derivative of the LHS w.r.t to $\epsilon$. This derivative is negative if $b<a$.
I am not sure how I can use this to prove the if and only if statement though, or even if this is a good approach.
Would it just be something like the following: For the forward direct -- $\frac{a}{b} > \frac{a+\epsilon}{b+\epsilon} \implies b<a$, -- would I just say that because the LHS of $\frac{a}{b} > \frac{a+\epsilon}{b+\epsilon}$ is the RHS when $\epsilon =0$, then this means that the RHS is decreasing in $\epsilon$.
The RHS being decreasing in $\epsilon$ then means that $\frac{d}{d\epsilon} \left [\frac{a+\epsilon}{b+\epsilon}\right ] <0$ which requires $b<a$?
Using the notation of derivative feels more high powered than necessary though.
So the question is what is a good method to prove the result in the question. And, if possible give some comment or example of how to prove one direction
$\begin{array}\\ \dfrac{a+c}{b+c}-\dfrac{a}{b} &=\dfrac{b(a+c)-a(b+c)}{b(b+c)}\\ &=\dfrac{c(b-a)}{b(b+c)}\\ \end{array} $
The sign of the difference depends on all the expressions in this final fraction.