Proving orthogonality of complex form of Fourier Series

2.1k Views Asked by At

I am lost when working on this complex Fourier Series question, I am sure it is a basic simple problem but I am not well versed in applied math:

Show that $\{e^{\mathscr i n\pi x/\mathscr l}\}, n = 0, \pm 1, \pm 2 \ldots$ is an orthogonal family on $-\mathscr l < x < \mathscr l$ with respect to the complex inner product:

$$\langle u, v \rangle := \int^b_a u(x)\overline{v(x)} dx,$$

where overbar indicates conjugation. Hit: Use Euler's formula $e^{i\theta} = cos(\theta) + \mathscr i sin(\theta)$.

Here are what I managed so far:

$$\begin{align} \langle u, \bar{u} \rangle :&= \int^{\mathscr l}_{-\mathscr l} [\cos (n\pi x/\mathscr l) + \mathscr i \sin(n\pi x / \mathscr l)][\cos (n\pi x/\mathscr l) - \mathscr i \sin(n\pi x / \mathscr l)] \ dx \\ &= \int^{\mathscr l}_{-\mathscr l} \cos^2 (n\pi x/\mathscr l) + \sin^2 (n\pi x / \mathscr l) \ dx \\ &= \int^{\mathscr l}_{-\mathscr l} \ dx\\ &= [x]^{\mathscr l}_{-\mathscr l}\\ &= 2 \mathscr l\\ \end{align}$$

The final result should be zero in order to prove orthogonality. Please let me know where I got wrong. Thanks for your time and effort.

2

There are 2 best solutions below

2
On BEST ANSWER

I think you're mixing something up, or not understanding the definition of orthogonality. Orthogonality means that $\langle u,v\rangle=0$ when $u,v$ are different pairs of members from an orthogonal family. Taking a pair of the same ones should not give you zero since inner products satisfy $\langle u, u\rangle=0$ iff $u=0$. So pick two different indices, $m$ and $n$ and do the integration.

For what its worth you can save yourself some time by just dealing with $\exp(i n \theta)$ and knowing that $\int_a^b \exp(i n \pi \theta)d\theta = \frac{1}{in \pi }\left.\exp(i n \pi \theta)\right|_a^b$

2
On

Consider $e_k(x) = e^{2 \pi ikx/P}$.

If $j \neq k$, \begin{align*} \langle e_j, e_k \rangle &= \frac{1}{P} \int_0^P e^{2\pi i j k / P} e^{-2\pi i k x / P} \, dx \\ &= \frac{1}{P} \int_0^P e^{2\pi i (j - k) x / P} \, dx \\ &= \frac{1}{P} \frac{P}{2\pi i (j - k)} e^{2\pi i (j - k)x/ P} \bigg \vert_0^P = 0 & \text{Use Euler's Formula} \end{align*}

If $j = k$, \begin{align*} \langle e_j, e_k \rangle &= \frac{1}{P} \int_0^P e^{2\pi i j k / P} e^{-2\pi i k x / P} \, dx \\ &= \frac{1}{P} \int_0^P e^{2\pi i (j - k) x / P} \, dx \\ &= \frac{1}{P} \int_0^P 1\\ &= 1 \end{align*}

Note: Since we have translation invariance, we can integrate over $-P/2$ to $P/2$ instead of $0$ to $P$. Chooseing $P = 2$ gives the integration from $-1$ to $1$ as you used.