How to prove suffixing $(p \to q) \to ((q \to r) \to (p \to r))$ from weakening and self-distribution axioms and MP. So, in system with axioms $$A1. p \to (q \to p))$$ $$A2. (p \to (q \to r)) \to ((p \to q) \to (p \to r))$$ and MP figure, how to prove that suffixing statement is a theorem (without Deduction theorem).
Proving $(p \to q) \to ((q \to r) \to (p \to r))$ from Hilbert formal system for positive implicational formal system?
574 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail AtThere are 2 best solutions below
On
Let's first prove Hypothetical Syllogism (HS), i.e. that $\{p \rightarrow q , q \rightarrow r \} \vDash p \rightarrow r)$:
$p \rightarrow q$ Premise
$q \rightarrow r$ Premise
$(q \rightarrow r) \rightarrow (p \rightarrow (q \rightarrow r))$ Axiom 1
$p \rightarrow (q \rightarrow r)$ MP 2,3
$(p \rightarrow (q \rightarrow r)) \rightarrow ((p \rightarrow q) \rightarrow (p \rightarrow r))$ Axiom 2
$(p \rightarrow q) \rightarrow (p \rightarrow r)$ MP 4,5
$p \rightarrow r$ MP 1,6
And now that you have HS:
$(q \rightarrow r) \rightarrow (p \rightarrow (q \rightarrow r))$ Axiom 1
$(p \rightarrow (q \rightarrow r)) \rightarrow ((p \rightarrow q) \rightarrow (p \rightarrow r))$ Axiom 2
$(q \rightarrow r) \rightarrow ((p \rightarrow q) \rightarrow (p \rightarrow r))$ HS 1,2
$((q \rightarrow r) \rightarrow ((p \rightarrow q) \rightarrow (p \rightarrow r))) \rightarrow (((q \rightarrow r) \rightarrow (p \rightarrow q)) \rightarrow ((q \rightarrow r) \rightarrow (p \rightarrow r)))$ Axiom 2
$((q \rightarrow r) \rightarrow (p \rightarrow q)) \rightarrow ((q \rightarrow r) \rightarrow (p \rightarrow r))$ MP 3,4
$(p \rightarrow q) \rightarrow ((q \rightarrow r) \rightarrow (p \rightarrow q))$ Axiom 1
$(p \rightarrow q) \rightarrow ((q \rightarrow r) \rightarrow (p \rightarrow r))$ HS 5,6
Here is complete answer. Thanks for help.