Trying to prove if this statement is a tautology:
$\neg (p\to q) \to p$
I can simplify the left hand side $\neg (p\to q)$ to $p\land \neg q$, but once I get there I'm stuck.
Trying to prove if this statement is a tautology:
$\neg (p\to q) \to p$
I can simplify the left hand side $\neg (p\to q)$ to $p\land \neg q$, but once I get there I'm stuck.
Apply the equivalence of implication twice, then commute and associate so that you can apply identity rules.
$$\neg(p\to q)\to p \\= (p\to q) \vee p \\ = (\neg p \vee q)\vee p \\ \vdots$$