In my Probability book I have come across the following passage: "Since the PMF is symmetric around 3.5, we conclude that E[X] = 3.5". The PMF in question is one of a binomial random variable uniformely distributed around 3.5. My doubt is: is it always true that if a distribution is symmetric around a value its expectation will be equal to that value? If so, how can one prove it without recourse to calculus? I have seen similar proofs on the internet, but all calculus-based and/or with zero as the point of symmetry. Thanks in advance.
2026-03-27 21:37:26.1774647446
Proving that expectation equals point of symmetry without calculus
156 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SYMMETRY
- Do projective transforms preserve circle centres?
- Decomposing an arbitrary rank tensor into components with symmetries
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
- Show, by means of an example, that the group of symmetries of a subset X of a Euclidean space is, in general, smaller than Sym(x).
- How many solutions are there if you draw 14 Crosses in a 6x6 Grid?
- Symmetry of the tetrahedron as a subgroup of the cube
- Number of unique integer coordinate points in an $n$- dimensional hyperbolic-edged tetrahedron
- The stretch factors of $A^T A$ are the eigenvalues of $A^T A$
- The square root of a positive semidefinite matrix
- Every conformal vector field on $\mathbb{R}^n$ is homothetic?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let me answer for discrete random variable, since you are talking about pmf. Any discrete r.v. can be described by $(x_{i},p_{i})_{i=1}^{n}$, where $x_{i}$ is realization and $p_{i}$ its probability.
Suppose $n$ odd. Denote $m=\frac{n+1}{2}$. Then, $\forall i\in\{1,\ldots,m-1\}$, $x_{m}-x_{m-i}=x_{m+i}-x_{m}$ and $p_{m-i}=p_{m+i}$. The former equality rewrites $x_{m+i}+x_{m-i}=2x_{m}$.
For $(x_{i},p_{i})_{i=1}^{n}$, $\mathbb{E}[X]=\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}p_{i}$. With the equalities above you can rewrite it as $\left(\sum_{i=1}^{m-1}p_{i}2x_{m}\right)+p_{m}x_{m}=x_{m}$.
If $n$ is even, then denoting $m=\frac{n}{2}$, $\mathbb{E}[X]=\frac{x_{m}+x_{m+1}}{2}$ is easy to show for symmetric discrete r.v..