Let $P_r (\theta) $ be the Poisson kernel; proving that it is an approximation of identity consists of proving that: $\int_0^{2\pi}P_r (\theta)d\theta=1$ and $||P_r||_{L^1}\le M $, for every $r\in [0,1)$, with $M $ real; $\lim _ {r\to 1}\int_\delta^{2\pi}P_r (\theta)d\theta=0$ for every $\delta\in (0,2\pi]$. I have two problems: first, how come $||P_r||_{L^1}\le M $? If $r \to 1$ the value of $||P_r||_{L^1} $ approaches a sum of infinitely many $1$, since $|e^ {in\theta}|=1$. Moreover, I know that to prove the last condition I should use this inequality: $1-2r\cos\theta-r^2\le c_\delta$, that hold for every $r \in [\frac 1 2,1)$ and $\theta \in [\delta , \pi ]$; however I don't see how this helps me. In order to show that the integral from $\delta $ to $2\pi $ tends to zero, it would be better to know that the denominator of $P_r $ is greater than some constant (for $r $ and $\theta $ in the same intervals as above, for example), so that as $r $ approaches $1$ we would be sure that the integral goes to zero. Can you give me a clarify about this? Thanks in advance
2026-04-13 00:47:49.1776041269
Proving that Poisson kernel is an approximation of identity
1.1k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in FOURIER-ANALYSIS
- An estimate in the introduction of the Hilbert transform in Grafakos's Classical Fourier Analysis
- Verifying that translation by $h$ in time is the same as modulating by $-h$ in frequency (Fourier Analysis)
- How is $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \cos(n\omega_0 t)dt=1$ and $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \sin(n\omega_0 t)=0$?
- Understanding Book Proof that $[-2 \pi i x f(x)]^{\wedge}(\xi) = {d \over d\xi} \widehat{f}(\xi)$
- Proving the sharper form of the Lebesgue Differentiation Theorem
- Exercise $10$ of Chapter $4$ in Fourier Analysis by Stein & Shakarchi
- Show that a periodic function $f(t)$ with period $T$ can be written as $ f(t) = f_T (t) \star \frac{1}{T} \text{comb}\bigg(\frac{t}{T}\bigg) $
- Taking the Discrete Inverse Fourier Transform of a Continuous Forward Transform
- Is $x(t) = \sin(3t) + \cos\left({2\over3}t\right) + \cos(\pi t)$ periodic?
- Translation of the work of Gauss where the fast Fourier transform algorithm first appeared
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The usual definition of $P_r(\theta)$ is $P_r(\theta)=\sum_{n \in \mathbb Z} r^{|n|} e^{in\theta}$ but using the formula for the sum of a geometric series we can show that $P_r(\theta)=\frac {1-r^{2}} {1+r^{2}-2r\cos (\theta)}$. From this formula it follows that $P_r(\theta)$ is a non-negative function. From the definition of $P_r(\theta)$ we see that $\int_0^{2\pi} P_r(\theta)d\theta=2\pi$ since $\int_0^{2\pi} e^{in\theta}d\theta=0$ for $n \neq 0$. Hence $\int_0^{2\pi} |P_r(\theta)| d\theta=\int_0^{2\pi} P_r(\theta) d\theta =2\pi$. This proves the first two properties (with $M=1$).
Let us prove the last property: $1+r^{2}-2r \cos (\theta) \geq 1+r^{2}-2r \cos (\delta)$ for $\theta \in [\delta, \pi]$ because $\cos (\theta)$ is decreasing on $[0, \pi]$. Hence $\int_{\delta}^{\pi} P_r(\theta) d\theta \leq \frac {(1-r^{2})} {1+r^{2}-2r \cos (\delta)} (\pi -\delta) \to \frac 0 {2-2\cos (\delta)}= 0$ as $r \to 1-$. Now conclude (from the fact that $P_r(\theta)$ is an even function) that $\int_{-\pi} ^{-\delta} P_r(\theta) d\theta \to 0$ and Hence $\int_{|\theta| >\delta} P_r(\theta) d\theta \to 0$ for every $\delta \in (0, \pi)$.
[Do not use integral from $\delta$ to $2\pi$; for a periodic function with period $2\pi$ the integral from $0$ to $2\pi$ is same as the integral from $-\pi$ to $+\pi$].