I'm having trouble understanding how this works, conceptually.
Let's say I have the simple sequence $u_n = \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}$. I know that this converges to 0.
I wanna show that, no $\forall \varepsilon>0, \exists N\in \mathbb N$ s.t. $(n > N) \implies \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} - 0 < \varepsilon$.
So in my head, to prove this for any example, I want to find a N defined as a function of $\varepsilon$. Is this the thought process I should be having?
Thus, I can just say that $\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} < \varepsilon \implies \frac{1}\varepsilon< \sqrt n \implies \frac{1}{\varepsilon^2}< n $ (since $n$ and $\varepsilon$ are positive.)
And now, what? I think it's proven, right? If we just take $N = \frac{1}\varepsilon$, then the implication works every time? Do I have to show it by saying:
$\forall \varepsilon>0$, if $n > \frac{1}{\varepsilon^2}$, then we have $\frac{1}{\sqrt{\frac{1}\varepsilon}}< \varepsilon \implies \frac{1}{\frac{1}\varepsilon} < \varepsilon \implies \varepsilon < \varepsilon $? But this isnt true,so where exactly am I going wrong? Thanks.
Note that from here we have
$$\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} < \varepsilon \implies n>\frac{1}{\varepsilon^2}$$
then $\forall \varepsilon>0$ it suffices to choose $n>N>\frac{1}{\varepsilon^2}$ in order to fulfil the definition of limit.