N. Elkies' page http://www.math.harvard.edu/~elkies/trinomial.html ends with an information about octic trinomials "whose Galois group is contained in $G_{1344}$".
One of reported trinomials, $x^8+324x+567$, "has a smaller Galois group, which embeds as a transitive subgroup into $G_{1344}$ (...) This Galois group is isomorphic with $G_{168}$, acting on 8 letters via the other guise of that group, as $PSL_{2}(\mathbb{Z}/7\mathbb{Z})$".
Using GAP one can check that indeed mentioned trinomial has Galois group $PSL(2,7)$:
gap> x:=Indeterminate(Rationals, "x");;
gap> GaloisType(x^8+324*x+567);
37
gap> t37:=TransitiveGroup(8,37);
L(8)=PSL(2,7)
gap> Size(t37);
168
In the context of the above web page it is surprising for me that $PSL(2,7)$ is not a subgroup of $G_{1344}$:
gap> t48:=TransitiveGroup(8,48);
E(8):L_7=AL(8)
gap> Size(t48);
1344
gap> IsSubgroup(t48, t37);
false
Moreover, there is another Galois group $G_{168}$, $C_2^3:(C_7: C_3)$, which is a subgroup of $G_{1344}$:
gap> t36:=TransitiveGroup(8,36);
E(8):F_21
gap> Size(t36);
168
gap> IsSubgroup(t48, t36);
true
Question: How should I understand this contradiction/"contradiction"?
TransitiveGroupwill give you one representative from a conjugacy class of subgroups. For two subgroups $A$, $B$ in the library it is not guaranteed (in fact not guaranteeable) that if a conjugate of $A$ is contained in $B$, then automatically $A$ is contained in $B$.To test for such inclusions, you will need to either calculate subgroups of $B$ and find $A$ there, or search for
IsomorphicSubgroups(which finds monomorphism into the larger group):So you see that the subgroup isomorphic to $L_2(7)$ is in fact
TransitiveGroup(7,5). (the groups are isomorphic but not permutation isomorphic.)