Let $$\theta(p) = \sum_{i=1}^n f_i(p) \, dx_i$$ be a $1$-form in local coordinates. then we define $F^*(\omega(p))(X_1,\ldots,X_n) = \omega(F(p))(DF(p)(X_1),\ldots,DF(p)(X_n))$ as the pullback of a general n-form
My question is now, can we also express the pullback of the $1$-form $\theta$ in local coordinates?
I suspect that it would be something like $$F^*(\theta(p)) = \sum_{i=1}^n f_i(F(p)) \, d(F(x_i)),$$
but I am particularly uncertain how the coordinates $dx_i$ transform under pullback.
Write $\theta = \sum f_i \,{\rm d}x_i$, so: $$F^\ast\theta = F^\ast\left(\sum_{i=1}^n f_i\,{\rm d}x_i\right) = \sum_{i=1}^n \left(f_i \circ F\right) F^\ast {\rm d}x_i.$$ Now we apply a point $p$: $$(F^\ast\theta)_p = \sum_{i=1}^n f_i(F(p)) (F^\ast{\rm d}x_i)_p.$$ Now take a tangent vector $X$: $$(F^\ast\theta)_p(X) = \sum_{i=1}^n f_i(F(p)) (F^\ast{\rm d}x_i)_p(X) = \sum_{i=1}^nf_i(F(p))\,({\rm d}x_i)_{F(p)}({\rm d}F_p(X)).$$
In details: $F^\ast$ takes a $1$-form $\theta$ to a $1$-form $F^\ast\theta$. The $1$-form $F^\ast\theta$ takes a point $p$ to a linear functional $(F^\ast\theta)_p$. This linear functional acts on a vector $X$ to produce a number $(F^\ast\theta)_p(X)$. Writing ${\rm d}x_i$ instead of $({\rm d}x_i)_p$, confusing the $1$-form ${\rm d}x_i$ with the linear functional $({\rm d}x_i)_p$ is only ok because the value does not depend on $p$, but it is good to keep this in mind. Do not confuse the map taking points to multilinear mappings with the linear mappings themselves.