Is the full QR decomposition the most general, which includes the reduced QR, i.e, is it alright to always compute the full QR Decomposition for a given matrix blindly? What's the point of having two different QR decompositions? Please tell me all the possible ways of finding the QR factorization using the Gram-Schmidt Process, if using the full decomposition always is wrong.
2026-03-25 14:19:13.1774448353
QR decomposition subcases
286 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in MATRIX-DECOMPOSITION
- Real eigenvalues of a non-symmetric matrix $A$ ?.
- Swapping row $n$ with row $m$ by using permutation matrix
- Block diagonalizing a Hermitian matrix
- $A \in M_n$ is reducible if and only if there is a permutation $i_1, ... , i_n$ of $1,... , n$
- Simplify $x^TA(AA^T+I)^{-1}A^Tx$
- Diagonalize real symmetric matrix
- How to solve for $L$ in $X = LL^T$?
- Q of the QR decomposition is an upper Hessenberg matrix
- Question involving orthogonal matrix and congruent matrices $P^{t}AP=I$
- Singular values by QR decomposition
Related Questions in GRAM-SCHMIDT
- Finding the orthogonal projection of a vector on a subspace spanned by non-orthogonal vectors.
- Orthogonal Function Dirac Delta Series
- Legendre polynomials: show that two algorithms construct the same polynomials
- Is there a more convenient method for converting a base to be orthogonal than Gram Schmidt?
- Gram Schmidt Process with inner product $\langle z,w\rangle = 3(z_1)(\bar{w_1}) + 2(z_2)(\bar{w_2})+i(z_1)(\bar{w_2})-i(z_2)(\bar{w_1})$
- Gram-Schmidt orthonormal basis
- Modified Gram Schmidt
- Orthonormal Basis of Hyperplane
- History Question - QR Factorization
- Dimension of an orthonormal basis
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
First of all, yes, any matrix $A \in \mathcal{M}_{mn}(\mathbb{K})$ can be decomposed in that pattern. Note that $Q$ and $R$ are not unique. However, you seem to misinterpret the role of the Gram-Schmidt process in the computation of the QR decomposition.
Your question is a bit vague. A QR decomposition can always be computed on any matrix you want, and the Gram-Schmidt process (GSP) is only one way to compute it. It's a "full decomposition" in itself, but it will lead to a different decomposition compared to another method. Therefore there is no such thing as a global decomposition, as you seem to think, but rather several ones. They are all theoretically equivalent but the methods practically differ in terms of numerical stability.
The main drawback of the GSP is that it tends to be — very — numerically unstable, notably because you may have to divide by small numbers during the orthogonalisation process. It requires $mn^2$ multiplications.
The two other main methods should be preferred. I won't describe how they work in details since the web is already full of great articles and implementations of these algorithms.
Definitely, a proper linear algebra library will use one of these two methods but never Gram-Schmidt.