I'm currently studying about volume forms. The theorem I'm trying to understand is the following:
A k-manifold $M$ is orientable iff it admits a nowhere zero k-differential form $\omega$.
The proof I'm reading is from here:http://staff.ustc.edu.cn/~wangzuoq/Courses/18F-Manifolds/Notes/Lec23.pdf (theorem 1.1).
I have a couple of questions:
$1.$ What does the notation $\{U,x_1,...,x_n\}$ mean? I'm familiar with the notation $\{U,\phi\}$.
$2.$ Why is it that if we assume that $\mu$ is a never-vanishing differential form on $M$, then for every local chart $\{U,\phi\}$ there is a smooth function $f$ s.t $\mu=fdx_1\wedge...\wedge dx_n$?
$3.$ What does the notation $\mu(\partial_1,...,\partial_n)$ mean?
Thanks in advance
$(U,x^1,\dots,x^n)$ is the local chart written in components, i.e. $U\subseteq M$ is an open subset and $(x^1,\dots,x^n)\colon U\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^n$ is a homeomorphism onto an open subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ from the given smooth atlas. The $x^1,\dots,x^n$ are known as the coordinates on $U$.
This holds true for any $n$-form. The point is that $\Lambda^nT^{\ast}M$ is a $1$-dimensional vector bundle over $M$ and if $(x^1,\dots,x^n)$ is a chart on $U$, $dx^1\wedge\dots\wedge dx^n$ is a frame for $\Lambda^nT^{\ast}M$ over $U$, i.e. for every $n$-form $\mu$ there is an $f\in C^{\infty}(U)$ such that $\mu\vert_U=fdx^1\wedge\dots\wedge dx^n$. The nowhere-vanishing of $\mu$ on $U$ then is equivalent to $f$ being nowhere zero on $U$.
$\partial_1,\dots,\partial_n$ are the vector fields induced by the chart $(x^1,\dots,x^n)$ that form a frame for $TM$ over $U$. You might be more familiar with the notation $\frac{\partial}{\partial x^1},\dots,\frac{\partial}{\partial x^n}$ for them. $\mu(\partial_1,\dots,\partial_n)$ simply denotes the evaluation of the $n$-form in these $n$ vectors fields, which is a smooth function on $U$. The fact that it is equal to $f$ follows since $\partial_1,\dots,\partial_n$ is the dual basis to $dx^1,\dots,dx^n$.