This is from "Excercise 24, "Stein-Shakarchi's Functional analysis"(Chapter 1)
we have $1\leq p<q\leq q <\infty$
Consider the Banach space $L^p\cap L^q$ with norm $\|f\|_{L^p\cap L^q}$=$\|f\|_{L^p}+\|f\|_{L^q}$ and let
$\Phi(t)=t^p,\text{ when }0\leq t \leq 1 \text{ and } = t^q \text{ When }1\leq t <\infty$
we have to show that $L^{\Phi}$ with its norm is equivalent to the space $L^p\cap L^q$
Let me define the Orlicz space $L^{\Phi}$.
Let $(X,\mu)$ be a measure space and $\Phi(t)$ is a continuous, convex and increasing function on $[0,\infty)$ with $\Phi(0)=0$ define
$$L^{\Phi}=\{f:X\to \mathbb{R} \text{ such that } \int_{X}\Phi\left(\frac{|f(x)|}M\right)\,d\mu<\infty \text{ for some } M>0\}$$ and $$\|f\|_{\Phi}=\inf\{M>0\text{ such that }\int_{X}\Phi\left(\frac{|f(x)|}M\right)\,d\mu\leq 1\}.$$
I am not getting how to start proving it, please any hint or anything will help me, thanks.
2026-03-25 09:43:43.1774431823
Question about equivalence of norms of Banach space
76 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in CONVEX-ANALYSIS
- Proving that: $||x|^{s/2}-|y|^{s/2}|\le 2|x-y|^{s/2}$
- Convex open sets of $\Bbb R^m$: are they MORE than connected by polygonal paths parallel to the axis?
- Show that this function is concave?
- In resticted domain , Applying the Cauchy-Schwarz's inequality
- Area covered by convex polygon centered at vertices of the unit square
- How does positive (semi)definiteness help with showing convexity of quadratic forms?
- Why does one of the following constraints define a convex set while another defines a non-convex set?
- Concave function - proof
- Sufficient condition for strict minimality in infinite-dimensional spaces
- compact convex sets
Related Questions in LP-SPACES
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- Understanding the essential range
- Problem 1.70 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Showing a sequence is in $\ell^1$
- How to conclude that $\ell_\infty$ is not separable from this exercise?
- Calculating the gradient in $L^p$ space when $0<p<1$ and the uderlying set is discrete and finite
- $f_{n} \in L^{p}(X),$ such that $\lVert f_{n}-f_{n+1}\rVert_{p} \leq \frac{1}{n^2}$. Prove $f_{n}$ converges a.e.
- Find a sequence converging in distribution but not weakly
- Elementary use of Hölder inequality
- Identify $\operatorname{co}(\{e_n:n\in\mathbb N\})$ and $\overline{\operatorname{co}}(\{e_n : n\in\mathbb N\})$ in $c_0$ and $\ell^p$
Related Questions in ORLICZ-SPACES
- The diagonal extraction procedure?
- Maximal growth condition for embedding of Orlicz spaces
- Uniform convexity of Orlicz spaces
- Boundedness of a sequence in Orlicz Space
- Sub-exponential and conditional expectation
- Luxemburg norm as argument of Young's function: $\Phi\left(\lVert f \rVert_{L^{\Phi}}\right)$
- Vallée Poussin's Theorem on Uniform Integrablity
- On non-centered subGaussian random variables
- Orlicz space property for locally compact discrete group $G$
- For what kind of random vectors do we have $\sup_{p \ge 1}\|X\|_p < \infty$?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
To show that the norms are equivalent means you need to show that there exists constants $0 < A,B < \infty$ such that for any $f \in L^p \cap L^q$ it holds $$A||f||_{\Phi} \leq ||f||_{L^p \cap L^q} \leq B||f||_{\Phi}.$$
So fix an $f \in L^p \cap L^q$. Decompose $f$ into $f_0,f_1$ via \begin{align} f_0(x) &= f(x) \cdot \chi_{|f(x)| \leq \|f\|_{L^p\cap L^q}} \\ f_1(x) &= f(x) \cdot \chi_{|f(x)| > \|f\|_{L^p \cap L^q}} \end{align} so that $f = f_0 + f_1$. Note that $|f_0|, |f_1| \leq |f|$ so they both also belong to $L^p \cap L^q$ Using this decomposition we have by the sub-additivity of norms \begin{align} \|f\|_\Phi = \|f_0 + f_1\|_\Phi \leq \|f_0\|_\Phi + \|f_1\|_\Phi. \end{align} Now let's look at the two terms separately. For the first we have \begin{align} \int_X \Phi \left ( \frac{|f_0(x)|}{\|f\|_{L^p \cap L^q}}\right ) d\mu &= \int_X \Phi \left ( \frac{|f(x)\chi_{|f(x)| \leq \|f\|_{L^p \cap L^q}}|}{\|f\|_{L^p \cap L^q}}\right ) d\mu & (\text{Def of } f_0) \\ &= \int_X \left ( \frac{|f(x)\chi_{|f(x)| \leq \|f\|_{L^p \cap L^q}}|}{\|f\|_{L^p \cap L^q}} \right )^p d\mu & (*) \\ &= \int_X \left ( \frac{|f(x)|}{\|f\|_{L^p \cap L^q}} \right )^p\chi_{|f(x)| \leq \|f\|_{L^p \cap L^q}} d\mu \\ &\leq \int_X \left ( \frac{|f(x)|}{\|f\|_{L^p}} \right )^p d\mu & (\|f\|_{L^p} \leq \|f\|_{L^p \cap L^q})\\ &= 1 & (\text{Def of } \|f\|_{L^p}) \end{align} The line $(*)$ uses the fact that either the $|f(x)| \leq \|f\|_{L^p \cap L^q}$ and the whole argument is less than 1, or $|f(x)| > \|f\|_{L^p \cap L^q}$ and the whole argument is 0, which is still less than 1.
Note that we have just shown by definition that $\|f_0\|_{\Phi} \leq \|f\|_{L^p \cap L^q}$ since this is a valid choice of $M$ in the infimum defining $\|f_0\|_{\Phi}$.
In essentially the same manner we have \begin{align} \int_X \Phi \left ( \frac{|f_1(x)|}{\|f\|_{L^p \cap L^q}}\right ) d\mu &= \int_X \Phi \left ( \frac{|f(x)\chi_{|f(x)| > \|f\|_{L^p \cap L^q}}|}{\|f\|_{L^p \cap L^q}}\right ) d\mu & (\text{Def of } f_1) \\ &= \int_X \left ( \frac{|f(x)\chi_{|f(x)| > \|f\|_{L^p \cap L^q}}|}{\|f\|_{L^p \cap L^q}} \right )^q d\mu & (**) \\ &= \int_X \left ( \frac{|f(x)|}{\|f\|_{L^p \cap L^q}} \right )^q\chi_{|f(x)| > \|f\|_{L^p \cap L^q}} d\mu \\ &\leq \int_X \left ( \frac{|f(x)|}{\|f\|_{L^q}} \right )^q d\mu & (\|f\|_{L^q} \leq \|f\|_{L^p \cap L^q})\\ &= 1 & (\text{Def of } \|f\|_{L^q}) \end{align} Here the $(**)$ line uses that either the argument is 0, or it exceeds 1. This is basically the reversal of the $(*)$ line above. Ultimately this shows that $\|f_1\|_{\Phi} \leq \|f\|_{L^p \cap L^q}$ since this is a valid choice of $M$ in the infimum defining $\|f_1\|_{\Phi}$.
Combining these facts with the one above we have \begin{align} \|f\|_{\Phi} & \leq \|f_0\|_{\Phi} + \|f_1\|_{\Phi} \\ &\leq \|f\|_{L^p \cap L^q} + \|f\|_{L^p \cap L^q} \\ \implies \frac{1}{2} \|f\|_{\Phi} &\leq \|f\|_{L^p \cap L^q} \end{align} which shows the left inequality with $A = 1/2$.
For the other bound note that the function $\Phi$ satisfies for all $t \geq 0$ $$ \Phi(t) = \begin{cases} t^p & 0 \leq t \leq 1 \\ t^q & 1 < t \end{cases} \geq \begin{cases} t^q & 0 \leq t \leq 1 \\ t^q & 1 < t \end{cases} = t^q $$ since $1 \leq p < q$ implies $t^p \geq t^q$ for every $t \in [0,1]$
From this it follows \begin{align} \int_X \Phi \left ( \frac{|f(x)|}{\|f\|_{L^q}} \right ) d\mu &\geq \int_X \left ( \frac{|f(x)|}{\|f\|_{L^q}} \right )^q d\mu \\ &= 1 \end{align} and the equality holds only if $|f(x)| \geq \|f\|_{L^q}$ for $\mu$ a.e. $x$. This is enough to show that $\|f\|_\Phi \geq \|f\|_{L^q}$ (a fact which you should spend a moment convincing yourself of to reinforce your understanding).
It also always holds that for $1 \leq p \leq q$ that $\|f\|_{L^p} \leq \|f\|_{L^q}$. Using this and the fact above we have \begin{align} 2\|f\|_\Phi &= \|f\|_\Phi + \|f\|_{\Phi} \\ &\geq \|f\|_{L^q} + \|f\|_{L^q} \\ &\geq \|f\|_{L^p} + \|f\|_{L^q} \\ &= \|f\|_{L^p \cap L^q} \end{align} which shows the right inequality with $B = 2$.