I just have a few yes/no questions, and would really appreciate if you could correct me where I am wrong, and for what fundamental flaw I have.
1. Would the set of coercive functions a linear space?
Would it be ill-mannered to take a set say $\{x^2,x^4,...,x^{2n+2}\}$ and argue this is a linear space?
2. Is the set of coercive functions a conical set?
My answer would be no, as conical sets are bounded above since a set $A$ is conical if whenever $x ∈ A, t>0$ ,$tx ∈ A$
3. Is the set of coercive functions a convex set? Yes, since they are all bounded below.
Let $f : \mathbb{R}^n → \mathbb{R}$ be coercive. Then which of the following are also coercive?
a)$f + g$ with $g$ bounded below
Yes
b)$f + g$ with $g$ bounded above
No
c) $f + g^{−1}$ with $g$ coercive and $g(x) \neq 0 \forall x$
(!!!)No idea
I assume the following meaning of "coercive": An extended valued map $f : X \to [-\infty,+\infty]$ is coercive if whenever $\|x\|\to+\infty$, $f(x)\to+\infty$. Here, the set of functions is called $F$.
The set $C$ of coercive functions do not form a linear space, because if $f(x)$ is coercive, $-f(x)$ is not coercive. Moreover, we can come across expressions like $+\infty-\infty$, which is nonsense.
No, the set of coercive functions is not a conical set. A set $C$ is conical if for every $t\geq 0$, $f \in C$ implies $tf \in C$. Take $t=0$, which gives that the zero function must be in $C$. But the zero function is not coercive. Note that if we exclude $t=0$, then $C$ would be "conical" in this limited sense.
Yes, the set $C$ is a convex set. Boundedness below, however, has nothing to do with this fact. A function may be bounded below and not coercive. But take $t\in (0,1)$, and $f,g\in C$, and it is straightforward to show that if $\|x\|\to+\infty$ then $tf(x)+(1-t)g(x)\to+\infty$ as well. Hence $tf + (1-t)g$ is in $C$.
a) Yes, correct. b) Correct, $g$ may be unbounded below. c) If $g$ is coercive, then $g^{-1}(x)\to 0 $ as $\|x\|\to\infty$. Therefore $f(x)+g^{-1}(x)\to +\infty$.