Questions about page 108-109 of Janusz's book Algebraic Number Fields

62 Views Asked by At

I'm reading Janusz's book Algebraic Number Fields (second edition) and I'm confused by the proofs presented on page 108-109. My questions are:

  1. In the proof of lemma 4.2 on page 108, why does $f(\alpha^n)=f(\alpha)^n$ imply $f(\alpha) \leq 1$?
  2. Second line on page 109 : he proved that the minimum value $m$ of $|z-\alpha|$ occurs at some $\alpha_0 \in \mathbb{C}$ by showing that the function $g(\beta)=|z-\beta|$ is continuous on the closed disk $B_{\varepsilon}=\{\beta \in \mathbb{C} \mid |\beta| \leq m+\varepsilon+|z|\}$. I can see the function is continuous. If he is using the extreme value theorem, then the extreme value theorem says that $\max_{\alpha \in B_{\varepsilon}} |z-\alpha|=|z-\alpha_{\varepsilon}|$ for some $\alpha_{\varepsilon} \in B_{\varepsilon}$. Why does this imply $m=\min_{\alpha \in \mathbb{C}}=|z-\alpha|=|z-\alpha_0|$ for some $\alpha_0 \in \mathbb{C}$?
  3. 7th line on paeg 109: he used the following formula $$z^n-\alpha^n=(z-\alpha)(z-\omega \alpha)\cdots (z-\omega^{n-1}\alpha)$$ What is this formula? How is it derived? Can anyone point me to a reference?

Thank you!

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

(1) Actually it is $f(\alpha^n)=f(\alpha)^n$ together with $f(a)$ being bounded by $\sqrt 2$ that implies $|f(\alpha)|\leq1$. Otherwise, suppose you have $|f(\alpha)|>1$ for some $\alpha$, then $|f(\alpha^n)|=|f(\alpha)|^n\to\infty$ as $n\to\infty$, contradicting the boundedness.

(2) For notational simplicity let $$A=\{\alpha\in\mathbb{C}:|z-\alpha|\leq m+\epsilon\}\\ B_\epsilon=\{\beta\in\mathbb{C}:|\beta|\leq m+\epsilon+|z|\}$$ Then $A\subset B$. Now you are asking why $$m=\inf_{\alpha\in\mathbb{C}}|z-\alpha|=\inf_{\alpha\in A}|z-\alpha|=\min_{\beta\in B_\epsilon}|z-\beta|$$ First by the definition of $A$ we have $\alpha\notin A\implies |z-\alpha|>m+\epsilon$. So we can remove the compliment of $A$ from consideration. Hence $$\inf_{\alpha\in\mathbb{C}}|z-\alpha|=\inf_{\alpha\in A}|z-\alpha|$$ And from the set inclusions $A\subset B_\epsilon\subset\mathbb{C}$ we have $$\inf_{\alpha\in A}|z-\alpha|\geq\inf_{\beta\in B_\epsilon}|z-\beta|\geq\inf_{\alpha\in\mathbb{C}}|z-\alpha|$$ thus finishing the equation.

(3) You can see this as a generalization of the equation $x^n-1=(x-1)(x-\omega)\cdots(x-\omega^{n-1})$.