The naturals: $\{1, 2, 3, ... \}$
$2 - 1 = 1$ and $\frac{2}{1} = 2$
$3 - 2 = 1$ and $\frac{3}{2} = 1.5$
$4 - 3 = 1$ and $\frac{4}{3} = 1.333...$
.
.
.
$167834632 - 167834631 = 1$ and $\frac{167834632}{167834631} = 1.000000006...$
$\displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty} (n + 1) - n = 1$
But ...
$\displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{n + 1}{n} = 1$
We've only considered a difference of $1$ (consecutive numbers) but look at the following example:
$10000001000 - 10000000000 = 1000$
$\frac{10000001000}{10000000000} = 1.0000001$
Observation
Ratio fails to distinguish or is bad at distinguishing one very large number from another very large number, but Difference can.
Ratios create an illusion of equality, but differences expose the druj (deception).
Question
Is this a known mathematical fact? What are views/opinions of mathematicians on the matter?
Illusion? Deception?
The ratio and the difference constitute distinct ways to think about or compare pairs of numbers. Either might be more informative—or appealing—depending on context and what features of the comparison are of interest.
Consider the old joke about the museum guard who told a visitor, “This fossil skeleton is sixty-six million twenty-one years old.” The visitor responded, “Wow! How do we know that?” to which the guard replied, “When I started here I was told it was sixty-six million years old, and I have been here twenty-one years.”