Consider two points from an arbitrary subset of $\mathfrak{R}^n$, namely, points $$p_1 = (x_{11}, x_{12}, \dots, x_{1n})$$ and $$p_2 =(x_{21}, x_{22}, \dots, x_{2n})$$
Let $P_1$ denote the conjunction
$$(x_{11} \le x_{21}) \land (x_{12} \le x_{22}) \land \dots \land (x_{1n} \le x_{2n})$$
and let $P_2$ denote the disjunction
$$(x_{11} < x_{21}) \lor (x_{12} < x_{22}) \lor \dots \lor (x_{1n} < x_{2n})$$
Let $P_3$ denote the following conjunction
$$\lnot(x_{11} > x_{21}) \land \lnot(x_{12} > x_{22}) \land \cdots \land \lnot(x_{1n} > x_{2n})$$
Does $P_1 \land P_2$ imply $P_3 \land P_2$? Or simply $P_3$?
Any input much appreciated. Reference material welcome.
$P_3$ is equivalent to $P_1$ (because individually each $x_{1k} \le x_{2k}$ is equivalent to $\lnot(x_{1k}>x_{2k})$, for $k$ between $1$ and $n$).
So $P_1 \land P_2$ does imply $P_3 \land P_2$ (and in fact the two are equivalent).