Suppose that we have some big DNF which doesn't have any redudant members (for example, if it contains $x_i$ then it can't contain something like $x_ix_j$). My question is: is there some effective algorithm that can reduce, if possible, this DNF to the form (by grouping some members) with the smallest amount of logical operations "or" and "and" in it. If there is no any effective, so what is the most effective one?
2026-03-25 13:54:50.1774446890
Reducing number of operations in a disjunctive normal form
55 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LOGIC
- Theorems in MK would imply theorems in ZFC
- What is (mathematically) minimal computer architecture to run any software
- What formula proved in MK or Godel Incompleteness theorem
- Determine the truth value and validity of the propositions given
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- Help with Propositional Logic Proof
- Symbol for assignment of a truth-value?
- Find the truth value of... empty set?
- Do I need the axiom of choice to prove this statement?
- Prove that any truth function $f$ can be represented by a formula $φ$ in cnf by negating a formula in dnf
Related Questions in BOOLEAN-ALGEBRA
- What is (mathematically) minimal computer architecture to run any software
- Put $f(A,B,C) = A+B'C$ in $Σ$ $\pi$ notation
- Definition of Boolean subalgebra
- Steps to simplify this boolean expression
- When a lattice is a lattice of open sets of some topological space?
- Boolean Algebra with decomposition property
- Simplify $(P \wedge Q \wedge R)\vee(\neg P\wedge Q\wedge\neg R)\vee(\neg P\wedge\neg Q\wedge R)\vee(\neg P \wedge\neg Q\wedge\neg R)$
- $B$ countable boolean algebra then St(B) separable.
- Who is the truth teller (logic puzzle)
- How to prove this Boolean expression?
Related Questions in DISJUNCTIVE-NORMAL-FORM
- k-CNF formulae and formulae that are not equivalent to them
- How to convert to formula to disjunctive normal form (DNF)?
- Disjunctive normal form process
- What is the rule to eliminate (Z AND NEG Z) in this formula?
- Simplifying a logical formula
- Is this the disjunctive and conjunctive nromal form for my porpositional formula F?
- Is it possible for the DNF and CNF to be the same
- How do I convert this propositional formula to DNF?
- Are my DNF and CNF for $A \land (A \lor C) \implies (C \lor B)$ correct?
- Find minimal DNF and CNF of a logical expression $(A \implies C) \wedge \neg (B \wedge C \wedge D).$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
There is such an algorithm: but it is extremely inefficient: given your original DNF $\phi$ say, enumerate all formulas $\psi$ that contain no more symbols than $\phi$ and contain no variables that are not in $\phi$; then find the shortest such $\psi$ that is equivalent to $\phi$. If you could find the desired formula $\psi$ efficiently, than you could efficiently solve UNSAT, the converse of the boolean satisfiability problem. But UNSAT is co-NP-complete, so I don't think we know much about the most effective solution to your problem. The large body of research on SAT-solving and logic circuit optimization may provide you with some useful algorithms.