Weinstein conjecture is about existence of a closed orbit of the Reeb vector field on every contact manifold. On the other hand, we know every contact 3-manifold admits a compatible open book, which implies the binding is tangent to the Reeb vector field, doesn't this imply the Weinstein conjecture? since the binding is a closed orbit of the Reeb flow?
2026-03-25 04:36:37.1774413397
Reeb orbit and open books
113 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LOW-DIMENSIONAL-TOPOLOGY
- Getting a self-homeomorphism of the cylinder from a self-homeomorphism of the circle
- Does $S^2\times[-1,1]$ decompose as $B^3\#B^3$
- Homologically zero circles in smooth manifolds
- Can we really move disks around a compact surface like this?
- Why is this not a valid proof of the Poincare Conjecture?
- Regarding Surgery and Orientation
- Can a one-dimensional shape have volume?
- The inside of a closed compact surface $\sum_g$
- How do you prove that this set is open?
- Understanding cobordisms constructed from a Heegaard triple
Related Questions in CONTACT-TOPOLOGY
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Geometrical meaning of generalized Dehn twist on $T^*\mathbb{S}^n$.
- Geometric meaning of Liouville vector field.
- An analogue of the Poisson bracket in contact geometry?
- The derivative of the action functional and Lie derivative
- contact geometry good reference
- Open book on any closed oriented 3-manifold
- Coorientation of contact structures
- Given a 2-plane distribution D in $ M^3$ ( 3-manifold, Contact Structure) , find a 1-form Generating D.
- Critical points of action functional are periodic Reeb orbits
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Weinstein's Conjecture is that every contact form on every closed 3-manifold has a closed Reeb orbit. This is stronger than requiring that every contact manifold admit a defining 1-form with a closed Reeb orbit.