I need to reference a fact that is in another paper. It is stated after a lemma, and follows from this, thought perhaps not very directly.
I could just reference it as "see [1, Pg. 5]" or "see [1, Page 5]" (I am assuming my bibliography is just labelled "1, 2, 3..." for ease)
Alternatively, I could say "As stated after Lemma 2.6 in [1]". However, I am not sure if the use "Lemma 2.6" in this case should only be used to refer to lemmas in the paper that it is written in.
Finally, I could say "see comments immediately after [1, Lem. 2.6]", but then I imagine if someone skims it they might look at the lemma itself, which is not the relevant point.
I feel like the middle case is best, but I didn't know if there was unwritten rule saying not to do this.