The integral form of the inverse Laplace transform is given as $$f(t)=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{s'-i\infty}^{s'+i\infty}e^{st}F(s)ds$$ where $s'$ is larger than the real parts of all the possible singularities of $F(s)$ on the complex plain.
I am quite curious why it can be given in this way, even though it works pretty well in some concrete cases. I tried to plug the Laplace transform $F(s)$ of $f(t)$ into the above expression, hoping that I can recover the original function $f(t)$, but it didn't go anywhere simply because it's really hard to precede without knowing the explicit form of the functions involved. However, I still believe there should be a general proof under certain conditions. Any help is appreciated.
Write
$$F(s) = \int_0^{\infty} dt' \, f(t') e^{-s t'} $$
Then, reversing the order of integration, we have
$$\begin{align}\frac1{i 2 \pi} \int_{c-i \infty}^{c + i \infty} ds \, F(s) e^{s t} &= \frac1{i 2 \pi} \int_0^{\infty} dt' f(t') \, \int_{c-i \infty}^{c+i \infty} ds \, e^{s (t-t')}\\ &= \frac1{2 \pi} \int_0^{\infty} dt' f(t') e^{c (t-t')} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dy \, e^{i (t-t') y} \\ &= \int_0^{\infty} dt' f(t') e^{c (t-t')} \delta(t-t') \\ &= f(t) \theta(t) \end{align} $$
where $\theta$ is the Heaviside step function.
I should mention that this was a little fast and non rigorous. I really should have had the ILT as a limit os some $T \to \infty$, and the delta function is a result of that limit. But I only wanted a simple, heuristic outline, so here it is.