I got two questions regarding the proof:
Why we can just assume $A_\mathfrak{m}$ as $A$ if we pick a sufficiently small neighborhood of $x$? (the 7-th line)
Why's the last isomorphism true?
Thank you very much in advance for answering my question.
I got two questions regarding the proof:
Why we can just assume $A_\mathfrak{m}$ as $A$ if we pick a sufficiently small neighborhood of $x$? (the 7-th line)
Why's the last isomorphism true?
Thank you very much in advance for answering my question.
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
