Let $M$ be a manifold, $X$ a vector field on $M$. Question: If for every point $p\in M$, there exist a neighborhood $U$, such that for any radial geodesic $\gamma$ in $U$, $X(\gamma)$ is a Jacobi field, then, must $X$ be a Killing field?
2026-05-14 06:18:12.1778739492
Relation between Jacobi field and Killing field
926 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- What is the correct formula for the Ricci curvature of a warped manifold?
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Geodesically convex neighborhoods
- The induced Riemannian metric is not smooth on the diagonal
- Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic notions of Harmonic maps.
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
geometry
circles
algebraic-number-theory
functions
real-analysis
elementary-set-theory
proof-verification
proof-writing
number-theory
elementary-number-theory
puzzle
game-theory
calculus
multivariable-calculus
partial-derivative
complex-analysis
logic
set-theory
second-order-logic
homotopy-theory
winding-number
ordinary-differential-equations
numerical-methods
derivatives
integration
definite-integrals
probability
limits
sequences-and-series
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
No - Jacobi fields only preserve geodesics, not all geometry. It's easiest to see the distinction in the flat case - any continuous family of linear transformations of $\mathbb R^n$ will preserve geodesics and thus produce such an $X$, but most linear transformations are not isometries.
For an explicit counterexample, consider the radial vector field $X = x \partial_x + y \partial_y$ on the Euclidean plane $\mathbb R^2$, which is clearly not Killing. An arbitrary geodesic has the form $\gamma(t) = (a+vt,b+wt)$, along which we have $$X(\gamma(t)) = (a+vt)\partial_x + (b+wt)\partial_y.$$ Since the Christoffel symbols are vanishing, the Jacobi equation is simply $(X \circ \gamma)''(t) = 0$, which is clearly satisfied.
What you can conclude is that $X$ is an "infinitesimal affine transformation", i.e. its flow pulls back the Levi-Civita connection. See e.g. Chapter 13 of Lang's Fundamentals of Differential Geometry for some discussion of the relationship - in particular you can conclude $X$ is Killing if you assume $M$ is compact, by a theorem of Yano.
Edit: addressing the comments, here's a (cumbersome) proof that for a torsion-free connection, the variation $\gamma(t,s) = F^X_s \gamma_0(t)$ is geodesic whenever $\gamma_0$ is geodesic and $X$ is Jacobi along every geodesic. This fact about $X$ implies the "global Jacobi equation" $\nabla^2_{v,v} X = R(v,X)v$ for any vector $v.$ I use the notation $\dot \gamma$ for the vector field $D\gamma(\partial_t)$, which is the velocity vector of $\gamma_s$ when $s$ is fixed. Note that $X$ and $\dot \gamma$ commute.
$\def\n{\nabla} \def\dg{\dot \gamma}$Applying the definition of the curvature and using $\n_X \dg = \n_\dg X$ we get $$\n_X \n_{\dg} \dg = R(X, \dg) \dg + \n_\dg \n_\dg X.$$ Using the global equation $\n^2_{\dg,\dg}X = \n_{\dot \gamma} (\n_{\dot \gamma} X) - \nabla_{\nabla_{\dot \gamma} \dot \gamma} X = R(\dot \gamma,X)\dot \gamma$ we can write this as
$$\n_X(\n_{\dot \gamma} \dot \gamma) = \n_{\n_{\dot \gamma} \dot \gamma} X;$$
i.e. $A = \n_{\dot \gamma} \dot \gamma$ and $X$ commute. Since $A$ is zero along $\gamma_0$, we therefore have $$F^A_t F^X_s p = F^X_s F^A_tp = F^X_s p$$ for all $p$ on $\gamma_0$, and thus $A$ is zero on all points that can be reached by flowing along $X$ from $\gamma_0$, as desired.