Is every k connected graph is k-1 connected or the reverse? I always get confused. Can someone explain with the help of an example.
2026-03-26 06:18:55.1774505935
Relation between k and k-1 edge connected graph
259 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GRAPH-THEORY
- characterisation of $2$-connected graphs with no even cycles
- Explanation for the static degree sort algorithm of Deo et al.
- A certain partition of 28
- decomposing a graph in connected components
- Is it true that if a graph is bipartite iff it is class 1 (edge-coloring)?
- Fake induction, can't find flaw, every graph with zero edges is connected
- Triangle-free graph where every pair of nonadjacent vertices has exactly two common neighbors
- Inequality on degrees implies perfect matching
- Proving that no two teams in a tournament win same number of games
- Proving that we can divide a graph to two graphs which induced subgraph is connected on vertices of each one
Related Questions in CONNECTEDNESS
- Estimation of connected components
- decomposing a graph in connected components
- Proving that we can divide a graph to two graphs which induced subgraph is connected on vertices of each one
- Does every connected topological space have the property that you can walk around a finite open cover to get from any point to any other?
- A set with more than $n$ components has $n+1$ pairwise separated subsets.
- Can connectedness preservation be used to define continuity of a function?
- Prove the set is not connected
- Related the property of two points contained in the same component
- Is a connected component a group?
- f is a continuous function from (X,$\tau$) to {0,1} with discrete topology, if f non constant then (X,$\tau$) disconnected
Related Questions in GRAPH-CONNECTIVITY
- Connectivity and minimum length
- Proving the graph $V=\{S\subset\{1,2\ldots9\}\mid3\leq\left|S\right|\leq4\},\,\,\,E=\{(u,v)\mid u\subset v\}$ is connected
- Prove or disprove that every graph $G$ satisfies $\chi (G) \le |G| - \alpha (G) + 1$
- The "$k$th diameter" of a graph
- What is κ(G) and κ′(G) and δ(G) for graph G?
- Can edge-connectivity version of Menger's theorem be generalized for two subsets of vertices?
- planar graphs and number of faces
- How to find a Graph's $K_v$?
- 2-connected graph that is not 3-connected
- Finding vertex-cut using Menger's theorem
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The answer is that it depends on your definition, and if you provide the definition you are using I can be more specific.
The definition on mathworld is that a graph is $k$-connected if for every set of $k-1$ vertices, removing those vertices doesn't disconnect it. In this case, if a graph is $k$-connected then it is also $\ell$-connected for all $\ell<k$. To see this, notice that if removing many vertices cannot disconnect the graph, then you have no hope of disconnecting the graph by removing fewer vertices.
The definition on wikipedia is that a graph is $k$-connected if $k$ is the smallest positive integer such that deleting $k$ vertices can disconnect the graph. Because of the use of the word "smallest," a $k$-connected graph is neither $(k-1)$-connected nor $(k+1)$-connected. Under this definition, a clique on $m$ vertices is considered to be $(m-1)$-connected
Another definition I have seen is that a graph is $k$-connected if there is a set of $k$ vertices such that removing them disconnects the graph. Under this definition, a graph that is $k$-connected is also $\ell$-connected for all $\ell > k$ since we can choose the $\ell$ vertices by first picking the $k$ vertices known to disconnect the graph, and then picking the remaining $\ell-k$ vertices arbitrarily.
Definition $1$ and $3$ come at the problem from "different sides" in some sense, and definition $2$ is equivalent to requiring that both definition $1$ and $3$ hold.