In class we proved that given two adjoint functors $F\dashv G:\mathbb C\to \bf{Set}$, where the category $\mathbb C$ is arbitrary, $G$ is (naturally) isomorphic to $H^{F*}$, where $*$ is the singleton (as an object of $\bf {Set}$). Instead, to prove that, given a $G:\mathbb C\to \bf{Set}$ represented by the object $C$, there is a left adjoint $F\dashv G$, we noticed that a left adjoint preserves the colimits. So given a set $I$, it can be written as $\coprod_{i\in I} (*)_i$, viewing it as the disjoint union of singleton; since $F$ must preserve coproducts, we try to define it as $I\mapsto \coprod_{i\in I} (C)_i$. Now, I should first $F$ also on arrows, and then prove that this is a left adjoint. However, I don't see how to extend $F$, and moreover I don't understand how to prove immediately that this is a left adjoint (the teacher said that this last check is very easy to do). So this should be an easy exercise, but I am stuck with it; thanks in advance for any clarify.
2026-03-26 04:28:42.1774499322
Relation between representable functors and adjunction
233 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Related Questions in ADJOINT-FUNCTORS
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- How do I apply the Yoneda lemma to this functor?
- Determining Left Adjoint of Forgetful Functor from $\tau_{*}$ to $\tau$
- What is the left adjoint to forgetful functor from Mod(R) to Ab
- Does the left adjoint to the forgetful functor have another left adjoint?
- Is coreflectiveness transitive?
- Group algebra functor preserves colimits
- Intuition for remembering adjunction chirality
- Does the inverse image sheaf functor has a left adjoint?
- Significance of adjoint relationship with Ext instead of Hom
Related Questions in REPRESENTABLE-FUNCTOR
- Reference request: Representability of multiplicative equivariant cohomology theories
- Representations and representable functors
- Characterization of a contravariant representable functor
- Proof that a functor covered by open representable subfunctors is representable by a scheme
- Representability criterion for Zariski sheaf in terms of open subfunctors
- Katz&Mazur's book: what is meant by "universal morphism" here?
- Expressing Representation of a Colimit as a Limit
- Brown representability and based homotopy classes
- Is : $ \mathrm{Gal} \ : \ F/ \mathbb{Q} \to \mathrm{Gal} (F / \mathbb{Q} ) $ represented by $ \overline{ \mathbb{Q} } $?
- Categories for which every contiuous sheaf is representable
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If I understand your question correctly, you are considering a category $\mathcal C$, an object $c \in\mathcal C$ and want to show that (if $\mathcal C$ admits all the necessary coproducts), $G = \operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal C}(c,-)$ has a left afjoint $F$ given by $Fx = \coprod_x c $.
How to define $F$ on arrows
Let $f:x\to y$ be an arrow in $\mathbf{Set}$. For each $j \in y$, there is a canonical monomorphism $\iota_j: c \hookrightarrow \coprod_y c$. Using the $\iota_{f(i)}$ for each $i \in x$ and the universal property of the coproduct, you can define a morphism $Ff: \coprod_x c \to \coprod_y c$. It is the only morphism such that : $$\forall i \in x,F f\circ\iota_i = \iota_{f(i)}$$ Using this last property, it is easy to show that this makes $F$ into a functor.
Proof that $F \dashv G$
For $x\in\mathbf{Set}$ and $y \in \mathcal C$, you have the following isomorphisms (natural in $x$ and $y$) : \begin{align*} \operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal C} (\coprod_x c,y) &\simeq \prod_x \operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal C}(c,y) \\ &\simeq \prod_x G(y) \\ &\simeq \operatorname{Hom}_{\mathbf{Set}}(x,G(y)) \end{align*}
The first line is the universal property of the coproduct, the second the definition of $G$ and the last is the definition of the cartesian product in $\mathbf{Set}$.