I'm reading the book: Coherent State in Quantum Physics, by Jean-Pierre Gazeau. In the page no. 35 of this book, the Weyl-Heisenberg Lie Algebra $\mathfrak{w}_m$ has been given that $$\mathfrak{w}_m=linear\,span\{iQ,iP,iI_d\};$$ where $Q=\frac{a+a^\dagger}{\sqrt{2}}$, $P=\frac{a-a^\dagger}{i\sqrt{2}}$ and $I_d$ is the identity operator with $a$ is annihilation operator and $a^\dagger$ is creation operator. One can see that a generic element of $\mathfrak{w}_m$ is written as $$\mathfrak{w}_m\ni X=isI_d+i(pQ-qP)=isI_d+(za^\dagger-\overline{z}a);$$ where $s\in\mathbb{R}$ and $z=\frac{q+ip}{\sqrt{2}}$. Here $X$ is the anti-self-adjoint and the infinitesimal generator of the unitary operator: $$e^X = e^{is}e^{za^\dagger-\overline{z}a}:=e^{is}D(z).$$ After this some discussion on the action of the D-Function. My question is, in the page no. 37, it is said that the map $X\longmapsto e^X=e^{is}D(z)$ is irreducible unitary representation of Weyl-Heisenberg Algebra, but first of all it, to say this map $X\longmapsto e^X=e^{is}D(z)$ is representation of Weyl-Heisenberg Algebra, I think it should satisfy the relation $$e^{[X,Y]}=[e^X,e^Y],$$ for all $X,Y \in \mathfrak{w}_m$, since it is Lie algebra. But I'm unable to obtain this relation. Could anyone please help me...!!! I'm looking for a explanation. Thank you in advance for any help.
2026-04-01 21:32:47.1775079167
Representation of Weyl-Heisenberg Lie Algebra
548 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REPRESENTATION-THEORY
- How does $\operatorname{Ind}^G_H$ behave with respect to $\bigoplus$?
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Assuming unitarity of arbitrary representations in proof of Schur's lemma
- Are representation isomorphisms of permutation representations necessarily permutation matrices?
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Help with a definition in Serre's Linear Representations of Finite Groups
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- Properties of symmetric and alternating characters
- Representation theory of $S_3$
Related Questions in LIE-ALGEBRAS
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Computing the logarithm of an exponentiated matrix?
- Need help with notation. Is this lower dot an operation?
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- Radical of Der(L) where L is a Lie Algebra
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Given a representation $\phi: L \rightarrow \mathfrak {gl}(V)$ $\phi(L)$ in End $V$ leaves invariant precisely the same subspaces as $L$.
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Related Questions in MATHEMATICAL-PHYSICS
- Why boundary conditions in Sturm-Liouville problem are homogeneous?
- What is the value of alternating series which I mention below
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- Intuition behind quaternion multiplication with zero scalar
- Return probability random walk
- "Good" Linear Combinations of a Perturbed Wave Function
- Yang–Mills theory and mass gap
- Self adjoint operators on incomplete spaces
- Algebraic geometry and algebraic topology used in string theory
- Compute time required to travel given distance with constant acceleration and known initial speed
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
M. Tharan
First I am grateful to you for reading my 2009 book and to help me to clarify some points in its content. Actually, what is written in page 37 is exactly the following
The operators X, through the map $X \mapsto e^X = e^{is}D(z)$, thus define an irreducible unitary representation of the Weyl–Heisenberg algebra $\mathfrak{w}$.
I did not write that the map itself is a representation of the algebra.
I wished to mean that the representation of the algebra itself comes from infinitesimal generators of the representation of the group. In an updated version I will improve that sentence in order to make the point clearer. Thank you again!
More informations are given in the recent arXiv:1703.08443v1 [quant-ph]
WEYL-HEISENBERG INTEGRAL QUANTIZATION(S): A COMPENDIUM