My question is the following: I encountered the statement
The residue field of an Artin local $\mathbb{C}$-algebra is $\mathbb{C}$
I understand that if the algebra $A$ is finitely generated over $\mathbb{C}$ this is true: $\mathbb{C} \subset A/\mathfrak{m}_A$ would be a field extension where the latter is finitely generated over $\mathbb{C}$ and thus it is a finite algebraic extension by the Zariski Lemma. However without the assumption for $A$ to be finitely generated it seems to me that the statement is not true. $$\mathbb{C} \subset \mathbb{C}(x) = A$$ It seems to me to be a counterexample.
Thank you for your help!
Yes, $\mathbb C(x)$ is Artinian, local and the residue is not isomorphic to $\mathbb C$. And your comments on finite generation are on-mark.
At nLab I find this:
So it seems the term "local Artin algebra" also assumes that $A$ is finitely generated over $\mathbb K$, and your example does not include that.