Hi could someone show me explicitly how to compute the ricci tensor $g_{ij}$?

2026-03-26 09:40:21.1774518021
ricci tensor of 2-sphere $S^2$
10.3k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- What is the correct formula for the Ricci curvature of a warped manifold?
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Geodesically convex neighborhoods
- The induced Riemannian metric is not smooth on the diagonal
- Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic notions of Harmonic maps.
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
Related Questions in SEMI-RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- Do pp-wave spacetimes have a well-defined signature/index?
- Can the Gram-Schmidt algorithm be extended to construct a basis for $T_p M$ of a semi-Riemannian manifold?
- Does a coordinate chart have a smooth orthonormal frame w.r.t. a semi-Riemannian metric?
- Is there a coordinate free proof for this result?
- Making sense of $2{\rm grad}(\langle H,H\rangle) + 4 {\rm trace}(A_{DH}) = 0$
- Points fixed by the isotropy group of the restricted Poincaré group in Minkowski space
- The equivalence of two definitions of Cauchy surfaces.
- How to solve a second ODE involving the Lorentzian function, possibly using analytical methods?
- Definition of a metric tensor in Barrett O'Neil's book
- Lorentz transformations in matrix form (Matrix Multiplication problem)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
This might not be the most straightforward way, but it's a nice trick that bypasses a lot of the calculation. For the Ricci tensor we use this formula: $$R_{ij}=\frac{\partial { \Gamma^l}_{ij}}{\partial x^l}-\frac{\partial { \Gamma^l}_{il}}{\partial x^j}+{ \Gamma^l}_{ij}{ \Gamma^m}_{lm}-{ \Gamma^m}_{il}{ \Gamma^l}_{jm}$$
Where we sum over repeated indices, and instead of lets say ${ \Gamma^1}_{21}$ I will write explicitly ${ \Gamma^\theta}_{\phi\theta}$.
We could just use a formula and calculate everything directly, but here's a faster approach. It's known that geodesics extremize arclength. That is, given a curve $\gamma:[0,1]\to M$, with its tangent (or velocity) vector $T^a (t_0) =\gamma_*( \frac{\partial}{\partial t}|_{t=t_0})\in T_{\gamma(t_0)}M$ and given the functional $$ S[\gamma ]:=\int_{t=0}^{t=1} \left( g_{ab} T^a T^b \right)^{1/2}\mathrm d t$$ called arc-length, $\gamma$ is a geodesic iff it extremizes $S$.
Let's call the integrand $\left( g_{ab} T^a T^b \right)^{1/2}=(2L)^{1/2}$. It can be shown explicitly that the resulting equations are the same as if we had the integrand (in coordinates) $$L=\frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu}\frac{d x^{\mu}}{d t}\frac{d x^{\nu}}{d t}$$
which isn't strange since one integrand is a monotonic function of the other.
So if we compare the Euler-Lagrange equation with the geodesic equation, $$\begin{align}\text{Euler-Lagrange: }\: \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot x^i}&=\frac{\partial L}{\partial x^i}\\ \text{Geodesic:} \phantom{{}=1}\frac{d^2 x^{i}}{d t^2}&= -{ \Gamma^i}_{jk}\frac{d x^{j}}{d t}\frac{d x^{k}}{d t}\end{align}$$
we see that if we find the E-L equations, we find the Christoffel symbols, and the Ricci tensor. In our case
$$L=\frac{1}{2}\left(\dot \theta^2 + \sin^2\theta\:\dot\phi^2\right)$$
where the dots indicate derivatives wrt the parameter $t$. For the $\theta$ coordinate we find: $$\ddot\theta=\sin\theta\cos\theta\:\dot\phi^2$$ and we conclude that $${\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\phi\phi}=-\sin\theta\cos\theta,\:{\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\theta\phi}={\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\phi\theta}={\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\theta\theta}=0$$
Similarly, the other equation is $\frac{d}{dt}(\sin\theta\:\dot\phi):$ $$\ddot\phi = -\cot\theta\:\dot\theta\dot\phi$$ so that $${\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\theta\phi}={\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\phi\theta}=\cot\theta,\:{\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\theta\theta}={\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\phi\phi}=0.$$
So we calculate the Ricci tensor components:
$$R_{\phi\phi}=\partial_{\phi}{\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\phi\phi}+\partial_{\theta}{\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\phi\phi}-\partial_{\phi}{\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\phi\phi}-\partial_{\phi}{\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\theta\phi} + {\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\phi\phi}{\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\phi\phi} + {\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\phi\phi}{\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\phi\theta} + {\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\phi\phi}{\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\theta\phi} + {\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\phi\phi}{\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\theta\theta} - {\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\phi\phi}{\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\phi\phi} - {\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\phi\theta}{\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\phi\phi} - {\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\phi\phi}{\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\phi\theta} - {\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\phi\theta}{\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\phi\theta} = 0 +(\sin^2\theta- \cos^2\theta) - 0 - 0 +0 +0 +(-\sin\theta\cos\theta\cot\theta)+0-0-(-\sin\theta\cos\theta\cot\theta)-(-\sin\theta\cos\theta\cot\theta)-0 = \sin^2\theta $$
$$R_{\phi\theta}=R_{\theta\phi}=\partial_{\phi}{\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\phi\theta}+\partial_{\theta}{\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\phi\theta}-\partial_{\theta}{\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\phi\phi}-\partial_{\theta}{\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\phi\phi} + {\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\phi\theta}{\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\phi\phi} + {\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\phi\theta}{\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\phi\theta} + {\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\phi\theta}{\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\theta\phi} + {\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\phi\theta}{\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\theta\theta} - {\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\phi\phi}{\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\theta\phi} - {\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\phi\theta}{\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\theta\phi} - {\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\phi\phi}{\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\theta\theta} - {\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\phi\theta}{\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\theta\theta} = 0 + 0 - 0 - 0 + 0 + 0 +0 +0 -0 -0 -0 -0 = 0 $$
$$R_{\theta\theta}=\partial_{\phi}{\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\theta\theta}+\partial_{\theta}{\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\theta\theta}-\partial_{\theta}{\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\theta\phi}-\partial_{\theta}{\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\theta\theta} + {\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\theta\theta}{\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\phi\phi} + {\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\theta\theta}{\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\phi\theta} + {\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\theta\theta}{\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\theta\phi} + {\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\theta\theta}{\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\theta\theta} - {\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\theta\phi}{\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\theta\phi} - {\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\theta\theta}{\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\theta\phi} - {\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\theta\phi}{\Gamma^{\phi}}_{\theta\theta} - {\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\theta\theta}{\Gamma^{\theta}}_{\theta\theta}= 0 + 0 - (- \csc^2\theta)- 0+0+0+0+0-\cot^2\theta-0-0-0 = 1$$
To get the scalar curvature, we form
$$R = g^{ij}R_{ij} = g^{\phi\phi}R_{\phi\phi}+g^{\theta\theta}R_{\theta\theta}= \csc^2{\theta}\sin^2\theta + 1=2.$$