I'm asked to find the Riesz's map:
$$R:H^1_0(\Omega) \rightarrow H^{-1}(\Omega) $$ $$R: u \mapsto F_u \quad \text{s.t.} \quad <F_u,v>_*= (u_F,v)_{H_0^1} \ \ \forall v \in H_0^1 $$
I chose $(u,v)_{H_0^1} = (\nabla u, \nabla v)_{L^2}$
Here's my thoughts: I need to find $F_u$:
$$(u,v)_{H_0^1} = <F_u,v>_* \forall v \in H_0^1 $$ $$-\Delta u =F_u$$
And this would be my solution, $R=-\Delta$
However, I found online that $R=I-\Delta$ ($I$ being the identity)
Can someone explain to me why my reasoning is wrong and how to find such a result?
If you use $(u, v)_{H_0^1} = (\nabla u, \nabla v)_{L^2}$, you get $R = -\Delta$, as you have shown.
And there is another scalar product on $H_0^1$, such that $R = I - \Delta$. Which one?