Let $P \in {}_B\text{Mod}_A$ a $B$-$A$ bimodule (for $A, B$ rings). We can consider the induction functor $$P \otimes_A -:{}_A\text{Mod} \to {}_B\text{Mod}:M \mapsto P\otimes_A M$$ and by the hom-tensor relation we get $${}_B\text{Hom}(P\otimes_A M, N) \cong {}_A\text{Hom}(N, {}_B\text{Hom}(P, N)).$$ Therefore, $${}_B\text{Hom}(P, -):{}_B\text{Mod} \to {}_A\text{Mod}:N \mapsto {}_B\text{Hom}(P, N)$$ is the right adjoint of the induction functor. However, in my representation theory course, we are studying Morita context and we saw that ${}_A\text{Mod},{}_B\text{Mod}$ are equivalent additive categories if and only if there is a strict Morita context $(B, A, P, Q, \mu, \tau)$ where $P, Q$ are in ${}_B\text{Mod}_A$, ${}_A\text{Mod}_B$ respectively. In the case that we have an equivalence of additive categories, the functors of the adjunction are exactly given by $$P \otimes_A -:{}_A\text{Mod} \to {}_B\text{Mod} \quad \text{and} \quad Q \otimes_B -:{}_B\text{Mod} \to {}_A\text{Mod}.$$ My question is the following: In the circumstance of an equivalence of additive categories, do we then have $Q \otimes_B - \cong {}_B\text{Hom}(P, -)$ in a natural way? If the answer is yes, is there any other case where the hom-tensor can be writen as an induction functor ?
2026-03-28 02:03:19.1774663399
Right adjoint of the induction functor.
205 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Related Questions in REPRESENTATION-THEORY
- How does $\operatorname{Ind}^G_H$ behave with respect to $\bigoplus$?
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Assuming unitarity of arbitrary representations in proof of Schur's lemma
- Are representation isomorphisms of permutation representations necessarily permutation matrices?
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Help with a definition in Serre's Linear Representations of Finite Groups
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- Properties of symmetric and alternating characters
- Representation theory of $S_3$
Related Questions in ADJOINT-FUNCTORS
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- How do I apply the Yoneda lemma to this functor?
- Determining Left Adjoint of Forgetful Functor from $\tau_{*}$ to $\tau$
- What is the left adjoint to forgetful functor from Mod(R) to Ab
- Does the left adjoint to the forgetful functor have another left adjoint?
- Is coreflectiveness transitive?
- Group algebra functor preserves colimits
- Intuition for remembering adjunction chirality
- Does the inverse image sheaf functor has a left adjoint?
- Significance of adjoint relationship with Ext instead of Hom
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If $P\otimes_A -$ and $Q\otimes_B-$ are quasi-inverse, then this equivalence can be promoted to an adjoint equivalence (this doesn't change the functors, at most the isomorphisms to the identity functor)
In particular, $Q\otimes_B-$ is right adjoint to $P\otimes_A-$, and since right adjoints are unique, it follows that $Q\otimes_B - \cong \hom_B(P-,)$, and in fact uniquely so if you fixed the adjoint equivalence mentioned above and require that the natural isomorphism preserve all the available structure (i.e. if you require that it be an isomorphism "of right adjoints").
To answer your second question, one needs to talk about dualizable objects. Indeed, let me make the context extremely simple for a second: suppose $A=B$ is commutative and $P$ is just an $A$-module (so with the bimodule structure that comes with it). Then if $P$ is a dualizable $A$-module, one has a natural isomorphism $\hom_A(P,M)\cong \hom_A(P,A)\otimes_A M$, in which case you can write everything with tensors ($\hom_A(P,A)$ plays the role of $Q$ in that context).
More generally, Morita theory builds on the following general fact, which isn't restricted to equivalences:
In particular, the right adjoint $\hom_B(P,-) : \mathrm{Mod}_B\to \mathrm{Mod}_A$ is of the form $Q\otimes_B-$ if and only if it preserves all colimits. For this, a number of things are required. Since colimits in $\mathrm{Mod}_A$ are detected in abelian groups, this is equivalent to $\hom_B(P,-) : \mathrm{Mod}_B\to \mathrm{Ab}$ preserving all colimits. In particular, this only depends on the $B$-module structure of $P$; and is in fact equivalent to $P$ being finitely presented and projective as a $B$-module.
Indeed, finitely presented is equivalent to preserving filtered colimits, so it is definitely required, and projective is equivalent to preserving epimorphisms, so it is also required. Conversrly, if you're finitely presented and projective as a $B$-module, you preserve filtered colimits, and finite colimits (finite coproducts and equalizers), so you preserve all colimits.
As a conclusion :
[note that for projective modules, finitely generated and finitely presented are equivalent]
When $A=B$ is commutative, this is equivalent to dualizability so we recover the example I gave earlier.
Side note: I'm not sure whether this is in fact usually called an induction functor, in my experience this name is reserved for when it's of the form $B\otimes_A -$, given a ring morphism $A\to B$.