I am stuck on the proof for this. This is what I manage to conclude so far: we have two trivial ideals, (0) and (1). Since it is not a PID, the ring R cannot be a field, so it must have some element that isn't a unit. Let it be x, so (x) is another ideal. Then, as it is principal, we must have another ideal, say I, which is not principal. (x) is not equal to I, so we have to have some element y that: either belongs to I but not to (x) (if I is not a subset of (x)), or y is in (x). Whatever the case may be, (y) is another ideal. That gives 5 ideals, but I am struggling to find a 6th one. My ideas were (x, y) or (x+y) but I cannot conclude that those ones are different from all the rest.
2026-03-29 14:31:25.1774794685
Ring that is not a principal ideal domain has at least 6 ideals
107 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ABSTRACT-ALGEBRA
- Feel lost in the scheme of the reducibility of polynomials over $\Bbb Z$ or $\Bbb Q$
- Integral Domain and Degree of Polynomials in $R[X]$
- Fixed points of automorphisms of $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta)$
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- A commutative ring is prime if and only if it is a domain.
- Conjugacy class formula
- Find gcd and invertible elements of a ring.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- polynomial remainder theorem proof, is it legit?
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
Related Questions in IDEALS
- Prime Ideals in Subrings
- Ideals of $k[[x,y]]$
- Product of Ideals?
- Let $L$ be a left ideal of a ring R such that $ RL \neq 0$. Then $L$ is simple as an R-module if and only if $L$ is a minimal left ideal?
- Show $\varphi:R/I\to R/J$ is a well-defined ring homomorphism
- A question on the group algebra
- The radical of the algebra $ A = T_n(F)$ is $N$, the set of all strictly upper triangular matrices.
- Prove that $\langle 2,1+\sqrt{-5} \rangle ^ 2 \subseteq \langle 2 \rangle$
- $\mathbb{Z}[i] / (2+3i)$ has 13 elements
- Ideal $I_p$ in $\mathbb{F}_l[x]/(x^p -1)$ where $\frac{\epsilon p}{2} \leq \dim(I_p) < \epsilon p$
Related Questions in PRINCIPAL-IDEAL-DOMAINS
- Principal Ideal Ring which is not Integral
- A variation of the argument to prove that $\{m/n:n \text{ is odd },n,m \in \mathbb{Z}\}$ is a PID
- Why is this element irreducible?
- Quotient of normal ring by principal ideal
- $R/(a) \oplus R/(b) \cong R/\gcd(a,b) \oplus R/\operatorname{lcm}(a,b) $
- Proving a prime ideal is maximal in a PID
- Localization of PID, if DVR, is a localization at a prime ideal
- Structure theorem for modules implies Smith Normal Form
- Let R be a PID, B a torsion R module and p a prime in R. Prove that if $pb=0$ for some non zero b in B, then $\text{Ann}(B)$ is a subset of (p)
- Why can't a finitely generated module over a PID be generated by fewer elements than the number of invariant factors?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let $R$ be a commutative ring with unity that is not a PID. Let $I$ be a nonprincipal ideal.
If $I$ is not finitely generated, let $X$ be an infinite generating set; we may assume no element of $X$ is zero. Let $x_1\in X$. Then $(x_1)\neq (0)$, $(x_1)\neq R$, and $(x_1)\neq I$. If for every $x\in X$ we have $(x_1,x)=(x_1)$, then $X\subseteq (x_1)$, so $I=(x_1)$, which is not possible. Thus, there exists $x_2\in X$ such that $(x_1,x_2)\neq (x_1)$. But also $(x_1,x_2)\neq I$. Continuing this way we obtain an infinite chain of ideals contained in $I$, so you get at least six different ideals.
So we may assume that all ideals of $R$ are finitely generated. Note that this means that there must be a $2$-generated ideal that is not principal, for if every $2$-generated ideal is principal, then every finitely generated ideal is principal (do induction). Thus, there is an ideal $I$, $I\neq R$, $I\neq (0)$, and elements $a,b\in R$, $a\neq b$, such that $I=(a,b)$, $I\neq (a)$, $I\neq (b)$. In particular we have the ideals $(0)$, $(a)$, $(b)$, $(a,b)$, and $R$, pairwise distinct. We just need one more ideal.
Consider $(a+b)$. Note that because $(a)\neq(b)$, we cannot have $a+b=0$, so $(a+b)\neq 0$. Because $a+b\in I$, we also cannot have $(a+b)=R$. If $a\in (a+b)$, then $a,b\in (a+b)$, so $I=(a,b)\subseteq (a+b)\subseteq I$, and we would have $I$ principal, so $a\notin (a+b)$. Therefore, $(a)\neq(a+b)$. Symmetrically, $(b)\neq (a+b)$. So now we have the ideals $(0)$, $(a)$, $(b)$, $(a+b)$, $(a,b)=I$, and $R$, pairwise distinct. That makes six.
In fact, six is the best you can do, as there are non-PIDs with exactly six ideals.
Note that there are rings in which every finitely generated ideal is principal (they are called Bézout domains, and a standard example is the ring of all algebraic integers), so if you are looking for a nonprincipal ideal you cannot just assume that there is one which is finitely generated. But if you know there are finitely generated non-principal ideals, then there must be a 2-generated non-principal ideal.