Even though it is intuitively clear, I get stuck on showing that a rotation or a translation of a regular surface conserve the principal curvatures in all the points of the surface ( while a general local isometry of a surface conserves only the Gaussian curvature). I think the reason is the conservation of the euclidean scalar product but I can't link this fact with the definition of principal curvature
2026-03-28 14:44:23.1774709063
rotations and translations conserve principal curvatures of a regular surface
151 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in ROTATIONS
- Properties of a eclipse on a rotated plane to see a perfect circle from the original plane view?
- why images are related by an affine transformation in following specific case?(background in computer vision required)
- Proving equations with respect to skew-symmetric matrix property
- Finding matrix linear transformation
- A property of orthogonal matrices
- Express 2D point coordinates in a rotated and translated CS
- explicit description of eigenvector of a rotation
- Finding the Euler angle/axis from a 2 axes rotation but that lies on the original 2 axes' plane
- How to find a rectangle's rotation amount that is inscribed inside an axis-aligned rectangle?
- Change of basis with rotation matrices
Related Questions in CURVATURE
- Sign of a curve
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
- CAT(0) references request
- Why is $\kappa$ for a vertical line in 2-space not undefined?
- Discrete points curvature analysis
- Local computation of the curvature form of a line bundle
- Closed surface embedded in $\mathbb R^3$ with nonnegative Gaussian curvature at countable number of points
- What properties of a curve fail to hold when it is not regular?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
$\newcommand{\Reals}{\mathbf{R}}\newcommand{\Vec}[1]{\mathbf{#1}}\newcommand{\Brak}[1]{\left\langle #1\right\rangle}$If $T$ is an isometry of $\Reals^{3}$, then there exists a unique orthogonal $3 \times 3$ matrix $A$ and a unique vector $\Vec{b} = T(0)$ such that $$ T(\Vec{x}) = A\Vec{x} + \Vec{b}\quad\text{for all $\Vec{x}$ in $\Reals^{3}$.} $$ The crucial points are, $DT = A$ is constant, and orthogonality of $A$ implies $$ \left. \begin{aligned} \Brak{A\Vec{u}, A\Vec{v}} &= \Brak{\Vec{u}, \Vec{v}}, \\ (A\Vec{u}) \times (A\Vec{v}) &= \pm A(\Vec{u} \times \Vec{v}), \end{aligned}\right\} \quad\text{for all $\Vec{u}$ and $\Vec{v}$ in $\Reals^{3}$,} $$ with the sign in the cross product formula equal to $\det A$. (For a rotation or translation, $\det A = 1$; for a reflection or glide reflection, $\det A = -1$.)
If $\Phi$ is a parametrization of a regular surface $S$, and if $\Psi = T \circ \Phi$ is the induced parametrization of $T(S)$, then with $(u, v)$ denoting coordinates in the domain (surface parameters) and subscripts denoting partial derivatives, \begin{align*} &\begin{aligned} \Psi_{u} &= A\Phi_{u}, \\ \Psi_{v} &= A\Phi_{v}; \end{aligned} &&\begin{aligned} \Psi_{uu} &= A\Phi_{uu}, \\ \Psi_{uv} &= A\Phi_{uv}, \\ \Psi_{vv} &= A\Phi_{vv}. \end{aligned} \end{align*}
It's now straightforward to check that every differential-geometric quantity for $S$ defined in terms of partials of $\Phi$, and the Euclidean dot and cross products, is preserved by $T$.