I'm confused about John Lee's proof of Whitney approximation theorem in Introduction to Smooth Manifolds. It claims that the theorem is an application of Sard's theorem, but I didn't find where it was applied. Also, he didn't prove the case that $F$ is not smooth on some closed set, and I've got no clue to utilizing the pattern (partition of unity) he showed. link
2026-03-29 10:18:21.1774779501
Sard's theorem and Whitney approximation
280 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-TOPOLOGY
- Getting a self-homeomorphism of the cylinder from a self-homeomorphism of the circle
- what is Sierpiński topology?
- Bott and Tu exercise 6.5 - Reducing the structure group of a vector bundle to $O(n)$
- The regularity of intersection of a minimal surface and a surface of positive mean curvature?
- What's the regularity of the level set of a ''semi-nondegenerate" smooth function on closed manifold?
- Help me to prove related path component and open ball
- Poincarè duals in complex projective space and homotopy
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
- Prove that the sets in $\mathbb{R}^n$ which are both open and closed are $\emptyset$ and $\mathbb{R}^n$
Related Questions in SMOOTH-MANIFOLDS
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Possible condition on locally Euclidean subsets of Euclidean space to be embedded submanifold
- "Defining a smooth structure on a topological manifold with boundary"
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
- A finite group G acts freely on a simply connected manifold M
- An elementary proof that low rank maps cannot be open
- What does it mean by standard coordinates on $R^n$
- Partial Differential Equation using theory of manifolds
- Showing that a diffeomorphism preserves the boundary
Related Questions in SMOOTH-FUNCTIONS
- Connecting smooth functions in a smooth way
- Is the restriction (to lower dimensions) of a smooth function still smooth?
- Understanding the proof of the Concentration-Compactness principle
- Does an integral inequality imply a pointwise inequality?
- A weird definition of regular function
- Are charts for smooth manifolds homeomorphisms or diffeomorphisms?
- Find a sequence $(\phi_n)_n \subset C^{\infty}_c(\mathbb{R}^N)$ which converges in both $L^p(\nu)$ and $L^q(\mu)$ to $1_E$
- Straight Lines are Strict Minimizers of Arclength in Euclidean Space
- Several Questions on Smooth Urysohn's Lemma
- For what functions is $\lim_{n\to \infty}|f^{(n)}(x)|=0$? (Where $f^{(n)}(x)$ is the $n$th derivative of $f$)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
You're right. In that proof, the author did not use Sard Theorem. The theorem that you refer to is called Whitney Approximation Theorem for Functions, which means that the continuous function on manifold that we want to approximate has Euclidean space as the target space. As pointed out by Ted Shifrin, we can always take $A=\emptyset$ if there's no such closed subset $A$.
The claim that Sard Theorem is used to prove Whitney approximation theorem is not about Whitney Approximation Theorem for Functions above, but about The Whitney Approximation Theorem (Theorem 10.21 proved later in the book) which involves function between manifolds, and the first step to prove this is to embed our target space (a manifold) into some Euclidean space using Whitney Embedding Theorem, which is a corollary of Sard Theorem.