In Barnsley and Vince's paper Self-Similar Polygonal Tiling https://people.clas.ufl.edu/avince/files/SSPfinal.pdf
fig $6$ shows a non-periodic tiling made from a kite in 6 sizes. The angles of the kite are $90, 135, 90, 45$. The sides are in ratio $2: 1: \sqrt2: \frac3{\sqrt2}$ (in no particular order). The reduction in size for each level is $\frac1{\sqrt2}$.
I'd show you the figure but I'm not allowed to post images yet but you can click on the link. There are other cool fractal tessellations there too and math that is over my head.)
This kite is the same as taking a square with sides of $2$ and cutting off a corner through the midpoints of two edges that are joined and cutting through the perpendicular diagonal. A number of patchwork designs are based on a $4\times4$ grid of squares with the corners cut to approximate an octagon but I've never seen the octagon partitioned into the non-symmetric kites in quilting circles.
The kite is also easy to knit due to its angles being $90$s, $135$ and $45$. I played around with the shape a bit and found some other tilings that it makes including two that are periodic. The set of kites has some interesting properties and I think it could be used for both quilting and knitting.
Questions:
1) Have you seen tilings with this shape before? (I'd like to see other examples)
2) Does the kite have a name? (would like to call it something other than Wonky Kite in the knitting pattern I'm working on)
3) Is there a web site where one could find all (or a large subset of) known tessellations like there is for number series?
I have not seen this tiling outside that paper before (I did come across that paper though in an investigation related to these questions: Can any number of squares sum to a square? and Can any number of squares sum to a square? ).
On your third question: There are a few tiling databases:
(I tried to look for the titling of your question there, but could not find it, but as you will see the search facilities are not great.)
Neither projects are quite comparable to OEIS. Partly it is because it is so much harder to organize tilings than sequences; also, there is much less about and use for tilings in the literature.